I LOVE JOHN OLIVER
Well then... some compilations.
John Oliver
Trashing AT & T
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T87urVUlD-E
Trashing brands
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqS7sddUVH4
(Not everything he's done, of course.)A
would be simply including "trademark" and "patent" rights to be waived. Option B
would be including "trademark" but explicitly refusing patents at all. Option C
can be either A or B, but stating that "if" we(holders of the license/code/asset) discover or reverse engineer any hidden content you've made with the license, we have the permission to use it under this same license and are able to distribute and modify it under the licence's terms(This is kinda GPL-ish, except instead of forcing others to stay open, we protect ourselves from accidentally or purposefully including derivatives down the line, be them proprietary, patented, trade secret, and so on. They can try to keep it hidden, but if it's out, it's ours/anyone's).
Also looking into legal aspects of moderation (or lack of it) regarding my club. For example, the club has no Discord or anything yet - for as much as I'd love to leave the place open and unmoderated, this apparently is simply not allowed legally, as I or the platform will be at fault. However, I don't trust people as moderators either, and so I'm looking for a partially-autonomous system plus human moderators, and a way for the community to "moderate the moderators" as well, in a direct-democratic kinda way or similar. Really good kick/ban appeal systems too, and ways to blacklist or publicize mis-moderation incidents.
Hope to brainstorm some ideas on the matter! (edited)A
would be simply including "trademark" and "patent" rights to be waived. Option B
would be including "trademark" but explicitly refusing patents at all. Option C
can be either A or B, but stating that "if" we(holders of the license/code/asset) discover or reverse engineer any hidden content you've made with the license, we have the permission to use it under this same license and are able to distribute and modify it under the licence's terms(This is kinda GPL-ish, except instead of forcing others to stay open, we protect ourselves from accidentally or purposefully including derivatives down the line, be them proprietary, patented, trade secret, and so on. They can try to keep it hidden, but if it's out, it's ours/anyone's).
Also looking into legal aspects of moderation (or lack of it) regarding my club. For example, the club has no Discord or anything yet - for as much as I'd love to leave the place open and unmoderated, this apparently is simply not allowed legally, as I or the platform will be at fault. However, I don't trust people as moderators either, and so I'm looking for a partially-autonomous system plus human moderators, and a way for the community to "moderate the moderators" as well, in a direct-democratic kinda way or similar. Really good kick/ban appeal systems too, and ways to blacklist or publicize mis-moderation incidents.
Hope to brainstorm some ideas on the matter! (edited)A
(What MD0 seems to do). However, still confused on the idea of if I make X and someone patents stuff with X in it, potentially hurting my/others own progress on it(for legal reasons, not out-pacing reasons).B
: Disallow Patents, or Option C
: Make anything made down the line available to anyone up-the-line, if it is found/leaked/reverse-engineered/etc.A
(What MD0 seems to do). However, still confused on the idea of if I make X and someone patents stuff with X in it, potentially hurting my/others own progress on it(for legal reasons, not out-pacing reasons). A
, which is just like CC0 except it adds:
v. trademark rights;
vi. patent rights;
into the list of rights to be waived as mentioned:
2. Waiver. To the greatest extent permitted by, but not in contravention
of, applicable law, Affirmer hereby overtly, fully, permanently,
irrevocably and unconditionally waives, abandons, and surrenders all of
Affirmer's Copyright and Related Rights
... etc.Should any part of the License for any reason be judged legally invalid or ineffective under applicable law, such partial invalidity or ineffectiveness shall not invalidate the remainder of the License
Which has actual lawyers say "This is well-made legally" and such.Validity of the Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication and its usability for bibliographic metadata from
the perspective of German Copyright Law
a. No trademark or patent rights held by Affirmer are waived, abandoned,
surrendered, licensed or otherwise affected by this document.
)buying in / speculating with old money to create new money <----------> coordinating directly between community members
One can view this as a transfer of wealth, if you play far on the first end of the spectrum. This includes trading, speculating, accepting crypto as payment, and is what most of the world still sees crypto as: a gambling parlor or ponzi scheme to take advantage of, or a threat to existing monetary systems.
On the far right of the spectrum, are probably systems that haven't been invented yet, perhaps that let members run nodes and validate transactions that record value directly, without having to pay an outside blockchain.
Today the way most people interact with coins is somewhere in the middle, or there are many more dimensions / axes than captured here.
For an OSE coin, I see the contribution / validation as: building, designing, documenting, uploading open source designs, and buying the parts or finished product.
Fablabs, hablabs, hackerspaces, and makerspaces can run the nodes that incorporate people's transactions and activities for free, based on face-to-face (even over zoom) interactions.
Ideally it would use a cross-chain contract, one not tied to any particular blockchain but secured by many of them.buying in / speculating with old money to create new money <----------> coordinating directly between community members
One can view this as a transfer of wealth, if you play far on the first end of the spectrum. This includes trading, speculating, accepting crypto as payment, and is what most of the world still sees crypto as: a gambling parlor or ponzi scheme to take advantage of, or a threat to existing monetary systems.
On the far right of the spectrum, are probably systems that haven't been invented yet, perhaps that let members run nodes and validate transactions that record value directly, without having to pay an outside blockchain.
Today the way most people interact with coins is somewhere in the middle, or there are many more dimensions / axes than captured here.
For an OSE coin, I see the contribution / validation as: building, designing, documenting, uploading open source designs, and buying the parts or finished product.
Fablabs, hablabs, hackerspaces, and makerspaces can run the nodes that incorporate people's transactions and activities for free, based on face-to-face (even over zoom) interactions.
Ideally it would use a cross-chain contract, one not tied to any particular blockchain but secured by many of them.