The Contract Address 0xf17e9e4e32d842e4ddfbed5750a26f7bd77777ee page allows users to view the source code, transactions, balances, and analytics for the contract address. Users can also interact and make transactions to the contract directly on Etherscan.
Hi guys, I saw the one page site of OAC and if find it misleading
1:39 PM
"The moment anyone purchases tokens the overal value of OAC increase. Giving us more capital to execute projects and reward the other OAC owners, including your future self"
1:43 PM
this point remind me only of some Ponzi scheme or pyramid scheme, it is not good that the main utility of this coin is only to increase his value... also because something like this can be subject to securities regulations
1:45 PM
I can imagine the OAC coin to be an utility coin: rewarded to people participating in the discord servers or people posting projects resources on the forum or people buying and selling objects on the bazar
1:49 PM
and then people with this token can participate in the community votes for proposals or new projects implementation. in this way the value of OAC would be linked to the importance and responsability of partecipating in the governance of a DAO (Decantralized Autonomous Organization)
hey thanks for the feedback! Yeh that was just a rough first outline, still trying to find the role/use of this coin.
From my perspective. It does kinda work like that though, Ethereum gets developed by the increased value it got overtime. This value (tokens sold for $) is used to fund bountys and dev work..
So early adaptors of ETH benefit heavily of the popularity it gained and now own more value
Still trying to find the difference between a pyramid and that..
3:23 PM
To me this seems like a very powerful way for getting resources for development, but yeh generally not a popular approach and gives a bad taste..
Agree that a utility token would for sure be a good fit to us though, but seems hard to get of the ground and implement.
Not sure @davehakkens I believe their thing is that they'll put tons of resources into developing this crypto and if you buy their token you'll earn alongside them. From your thing seems more give us the money, the more people gives money the more everyone gets money. But seems like we wouldn't do anything to develop OAC or its technology.
1:58 PM
Also correct me if I'm wrong, but usually coins and crypto are setup and developed by highly technical team/companies that have a core tech drive to make the crypto better. Improving the technology and bringing about an innovation within that world. Up for disrupting that concept but taking a no-tech approach to that world seems risky
I'm pretty sure Nexo doesnt do anything to improve their token. They are quite static.
It's also running on ERC-20 (Ethereum) like us. If Ethereum blockchain improves, they improve. But it's not up to them.
Nexo might improve their own platform, find more ways to distribute the token, create reward programs etc. But I would say thats about it..
Nexo unlike OAC is thought of as an utility token: it's
"The World’s First Dividend-Paying Asset-Backed Token" and it gives holders some benefits with interest on assets and some dividends yearly distributed to the community as shown on the token page. Instead: what are the benefits and utilities of OAC for an investor? Otherwise if It's only for charity and crowfunding it is simplier to accept crypto donations
yeh I would see OAC more like a charity (until we come up with utilities like that ️)
It's more fun than a donation because you get a coin in return. A coin that might become something valuable/useful in the future. + You could always get money back if you stop believing in the project by selling it again.
No direct benefits as an investor
I guess it has similarities to something like dogecoin, kinda useless as a utility. *most People support for the fun of it. But if you where an early supporter holding many tokens you benefit a lot from all that community support. (In our case we would be holding 60% of tokens to distribute for meaning full projects )
But I would still be curious if that is considered illegal or a pyramid..(edited)
I have a very half baked idea.
In my opinion the reason that a community / protocol like Ethereum is so powerful is that it aligns the self interest of the individual with the interests of the community. The more apps that get built on Ethereum, the more valuable ETH is, and the more the community benefits. Essentially network effects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect
Been asking the question a lot with Precious Plastic - how to incentivize the improvers of the recycling machine designs to share this back to the community? Right now there is only a negative incentive - if they share then another machine builder can take those designs and compete for marketshare.
What if there was a way to tokenize the designs, so that every-time they are improved, the underlying token becomes more valuable. I feel like something could be worked out with NFTs. So as long as the machine builder was a holder of this token, they would in theory have an incentive to share back.
https://decrypt.co/68501/ibm-is-turning-patents-into-nfts(edited)
In economics, a network effect (also called network externality or demand-side economies of scale) is the phenomenon by which the value or utility a user derives from a good or service depends on the number of users of compatible products. Network effects are typically positive, resulting in a given user deriving more value from a product as oth...
A peer-to-peer marketplace for rare digital items and crypto collectibles. Buy, sell, auction, and discover CryptoKitties, Decentraland, Gods Unchained cards, blockchain game items, and more. Over 100,000 collectibles on sale now!
It's hard for me to wrap my head around the digital art thing. But music i can more relate to. This is an interesting example of how the NFT also includes exclusive benefits. That's kinda cool. And the fact that the original creator gets a percentage fee everytime it's sold is . Just thinking like a blueprints of the shredder with an exclusive lazercut file embedded there with a cool design or somethin. Maybe the eth address on one of the plates
https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/news/kings-of-leon-when-you-see-yourself-album-nft-crypto-1135192/
another half baked idea based on that️ :
Useful = OAC
Members: buy coins to support the content they like
Workspaces: Receive those coins
Owning many OAC shows a dedicated member, they either make good content or support financially (merge of patreons and community contributors)
Yes sure! I can image minting artworks: badges, short video, trailer or graphics to celebrate certain goals achieved by the One Army community: for example for Precius Plastic V.5 launching date One Army will mint alongside an artwork celebrating the result, who buy it will be donating and giving support to the project while receiving also something nice in return (it's like the Patreon stickers incentive), thanks to a fixed suply (100 pieces) it can appreciate also in time if the following and attention to the project grow, and in future every time, and if, one of this badges sold the One Army will always receive 10% all future sales (numbers are arbitrary)
7:08 PM
Look at this for badges examples
https://www.poap.xyz/
POAP is a software system that allows humans to collect badges (in the form of non fungible tokens) every time they participate in an activity, in person or remotely
Gitcoin has a cool way of getting the tokens. Instead of just everyone that every created an account. You first answer a few questions to see if you understand what Gitcoin is and then they verifiy wheter you actually used it.. To filter out the "real" community
Yes, the airdrop arrive after 2 min of “effort”: basically you only need to answer 3 questions and delegate or choose on which percentage distribute your vote, but anyway I’m curious to see how the governance will evolve in the next months
Like many people on the internet, we here at Creative Commons have been thinking about NFTs, and the possibilities that unique digital assets might bring for artists and creators. (By the way, did you know that Beeple, the artist who famously sold an NFT for $69 million, has been using CC licenses for years?) Most … Read More "At the Intersectio...
Also just brainstorming here, what if we minted 1000 copies of a new machine and sold them as nfts. We don't "open source" it. You have to buy one of those nfts to read them. People can buy and sell these of course.
Hey @Joseph couldn't comment on the above so here a few comments:
Bazar budget as burning mechanism seems minimal
"Precious Plastic DAO Treasury to fund community contribution rewards" isn't this treasury finite?
Gotta be careful not to drive the focus of the community exclusively towards certain areas.. or rather gotta tokenize what pp needs in the long run but some of those ones are hard to put a price on
Looks good, in its nascent form but it is exciting.. hopefully it bring more spam bots to discord
Yes that's why we would need to push Bazar ALOT. And give us a good incentive. And as we would airdrop tokens to existing sellers, THEY would have a big incentive to sell ON bazar.
the tokens are finite yes. But the value of each token is not finite. So the treasurey could grow indefinitely in value
ya
bring em on . I just joined a few new servers with re-captcha bots that will stop them if we need
Is the logic as follow?
You want people to govern the project > Ok, but which people? > Ideally the most invested in the project > How do you measure that? > PPC > The more someone works or contributes to the project > the more PPC earns > Or the more someone invests literally by buying PPC (this part I don't like) > the more say s/he would have on the voting > You have a DAO(edited)
@Mattia yeah i'd say yeah that's a good sum up. But it more starts from the fact that we want people to contribute to the project.
3:47 PM
Concerning the rich PPC people having more say, I'd say this is addressed by the fact that the core team first puts the proposals on the forum. This allows people feedback and or alternative proposals. This is where they are "vibe checking" the community for what they want.
Then they use the voting to essentially confirm the vibe check was correct. So I don't see people buying in control as being a problem.
If it really is a problem, we can use quadratic voting, which is a mechanism to address that issue https://docs.snapshot.org/proposals/voting-types#quadratic-voting(edited)
Hey guys! Excited to be here
I met @Joseph on Commons Stack server and had a call together with @Mattia last week.
I have started to contact a few people on Commons Stack and Token Engineering
PS. We run a small workshop in Tanzania.
Mettodo | Njombe Beyond
Hey guys! Excited to be here
I met @Joseph on Commons Stack server and had a call together with @Mattia last week.
I have started to contact a few people on Commons Stack and Token Engineering
PS. We run a small workshop in Tanzania.
I have invited @enti to this channel (do I have rights to do so?). He is a contributor on 1Hive and we are in touch since he posted about bridging crypto and real life communities (https://forum.1hive.org/t/gardens-for-real-world-communities/4271). He can surely contribute to the discussion on community/governance(edited)
I'm thinking the ABC to enter our eco-system, and then instead of burning PPC with the marketplace fees, have the sellers pay the fees in it to the DAO treasury
other stuff you may want to consider as well is dipping your toes a bit in other crypto initiatives that doesn't necessarily involve making a fundamental change on your structure like idk testing Gitcoin grants, Giveth, NFTs the same way you have patreon or something?
oh awesome! I've been looking a lot at 1Hive for our DAO
8:40 PM
it's interesting how these different dao platforms carve out slightly different features and tools. I'm not sure which one is best
Joseph
Also just brainstorming here, what if we minted 1000 copies of a new machine and sold them as nfts. We don't "open source" it. You have to buy one of those nfts to read them. People can buy and sell these of course.
it's very financially difficult for us to operate. The project doesn't quite fit into any of the right boxes for the old world - grants, donations, business models, etc
The scale is truly insane given the amount of resources that have gone into this project
8:58 PM
Ok well we did have a huge development year where over 100 people contributed
8:58 PM
we had 300,000 euros to do that
8:59 PM
but everyone volunteered and did it for free
9:00 PM
Still though, I'm always amazed by our impact given the amount of resources. It's really due to a community driven approach and completely open source nature of it
btw (im just throwing a bunch of ideas hehe) i'm not sure if you have like community activities or how you deal with that but have you thought about potentially educating on crypto topics to contributors? i'd happily volunteer to that and im sure a lot of folks on other daos would as well
can potentially serve to help contributors find more ways to support themselves as well as sensing how far (or close) away is the community from accepting or actually using it
It is basically a crypto crowdfunding platform for "good causes" (donations with fiat coming soon too).
They have recently launched their token GIV and a number of mechanism around it. They call it all the GIVeconomy. They use tools developed by 1Hive
I am excited about Gurves (which is in their roadmap): helping charities become DAOs with their microeconomies: https://twitter.com/Givethio/status/1491051233259364352?s=20&t=zkjVEvGL7QLqSqhEbBBrHw
We have a couple of projects there, ready to add PP (edited)
Our mission is to reward & empower those who give.
Let's transform donors into impact investors & nonprofits into DAOs w/ their own microeconomies #Gurves
It's a "slippery slope" that will change charitable giving & #publicgoods funding forever.
https://t.co/k3iTpFX1zghttps://t.co/c9XJHCBk2g
that is something to keep in mind though, most people think of all of this through that lens. So needs to be fleshed out and worked through so that we dont have that impact
I think something that's important about this PPC initiative is that we have a goal that is not about blockchain/crypto first.
To me it's:
Trying to build the world's largest plastic recycling cooperative to tackle the plastic waste problem.
The tech behind it is just doing the work of aligning incentives and coordination
I tried to create a little summary video of the idea. This is just the first draft. The idea would be to have a video to explain the concept and get more people into this group. LMK what you think
https://www.loom.com/share/a4885baa036b41f78e0e352497d0c977
Chu and Fancy are part of the core team at Protein Community, these thoughts are their own and don’t represent the views of the full Community. We’d like to say thank you to Other Internet and their article on Headless Brands, which was integral to our thinking.
3:22 PM
3:22 PM
Glad he called it PPT and not PPC
Joseph
I tried to create a little summary video of the idea. This is just the first draft. The idea would be to have a video to explain the concept and get more people into this group. LMK what you think
https://www.loom.com/share/a4885baa036b41f78e0e352497d0c977
What did you guys think of framing the dao as a decentralized recycling cooperative? I think it would be smart not to be Blockchain / crypto first in terms of communication. Like that is just a technology that is enabling us to achieve something else
@Joseph makes sense.. cooperative sounds a bit old-communist-dude from the 90s with all due respect.. a bit retro is there a more contemporary term to frame it?
4:00 PM
Very much agree on shifting focus away from the tech(edited)
Mattia
@Joseph makes sense.. cooperative sounds a bit old-communist-dude from the 90s with all due respect.. a bit retro is there a more contemporary term to frame it?
Ya I could see some imagery hinting there though. I keep thinking about people dressed up in the blue jumpsuits around the world in their workspaces. We could create some awesome pics / poster images
It's so cool that literally anyone can be a part of the commons / cooperative . Both the people running the workspaces and people donating their plastic.
I can only imagine the type of non financial help it will bring to workspaces as well. Like if I am a token holder in Thailand, I have an incentive to help BOPE succeed. Could drive customers to him or whatever
The most existential question in crypto: what will be the relationship between tokens and communities?
At stake: can DAOs bring virtue back to scaled organization? Or will they accelerate the economics-only mentalities that have been corroding society?
A way-too-long-
Retweets
194
Likes
829
Joseph
I am very much thinking of joining Commons Stack trusted Seed. If we are going to do this, those guys would be a huge asset.
I tried to create a little summary video of the idea. This is just the first draft. The idea would be to have a video to explain the concept and get more people into this group. LMK what you think
https://www.loom.com/share/a4885baa036b41f78e0e352497d0c977
Nice! The audience are token engineers/DAO contributors and the goal is that they understand what PP is and the problem we think tokenisation can solve, right?
Mettodo | Njombe Beyond
Nice! The audience are token engineers/DAO contributors and the goal is that they understand what PP is and the problem we think tokenisation can solve, right?
sort of similar. Less professionalized than them I would say.
Joseph
I tried to create a little summary video of the idea. This is just the first draft. The idea would be to have a video to explain the concept and get more people into this group. LMK what you think
https://www.loom.com/share/a4885baa036b41f78e0e352497d0c977
i applied also to be a trusted seed, afaik they aren't precisely focused on accelerating projects but on making tech that can be used by them
1
8:23 PM
not like they're going to dedicate funds or any resource to a specific project, but learning from them and being around is more about expanding knowledge about commons and making connections with experts on those matters
1
Joseph
@enti I would be curious to see if this is clear to you as someone who's new to Precious Plastic
not like they're going to dedicate funds or any resource to a specific project, but learning from them and being around is more about expanding knowledge about commons and making connections with experts on those matters
which is really important anyways, a DAO token is just as valuable as the underlying community
1
enti
not like they're going to dedicate funds or any resource to a specific project, but learning from them and being around is more about expanding knowledge about commons and making connections with experts on those matters
Tokens begin by giving communities incentive powers. Over time, might they turn all our groups economic? Will every interaction be only a chance to build wealth?
It depends on whether tokens can be more than financial - can they represent or co-exist with other motivations?
9:01 PM
https://twitter.com/dazuck/status/1380160252621041665?s=20&t=NXjfHqvnJRiDpCPQzb4VHQ this i think is something that TEC has done better than 1Hive for example, governance is through their token but the common pool is in stablecoins - $TEC still has monetary value but it's not necessarily the economic vehicle that's used for expenses and any kind of payment
1. Make community tokens look less like money.
Non-fungibility, non-transferability, limited liquidity, penalties for norm violations could all work. The token can still hold value, but is less likely to attract value-dilutive speculators or be viewed as a purely economic asset
Likes
101
9:02 PM
they also have a non-transferrable reputation token that gives you access to stuff where they consider you need to have a record of contributions to the community, like ABC hatches
https://twitter.com/dazuck/status/1380160252621041665?s=20&t=NXjfHqvnJRiDpCPQzb4VHQ this i think is something that TEC has done better than 1Hive for example, governance is through their token but the common pool is in stablecoins - $TEC still has monetary value but it's not necessarily the economic vehicle that's used for expenses and any kind of payment
what i'm still having a hard time thinking about is the utility of the pp token... mostly we talk about how can it be used as a way to incentive participants and stop depending on grands and such but how?
what i'm still having a hard time thinking about is the utility of the pp token... mostly we talk about how can it be used as a way to incentive participants and stop depending on grands and such but how?
a complete roller coaster but really fun and worth it hehe
9:25 PM
I had just a bit of experience using crypto and when I joined 1Hive after reading the wiki and everything it was just too much to take in I just kinda gave up
9:25 PM
after like two weeks I suddenly internalised everything and that’s where I started really contributing
yup i think so, we had to build some tools to be able to handle the size of our instance like a discord bot to automate onboarding and some other stuff but yeah
adding value to the ecosystem, i guess is a bit of luck that we had a lot of pretty good and experienced contributors that added a lot on the process
10:01 PM
plus some important actors buying the token in decent quantities, which i guess count as an investment towards 1Hive but it's not a formal investment or seed investment etc.
that's what i'm saying, there wasn't a ICO for the token
10:04 PM
and to some point that's one of the issues we are trying to deal with now, all expenses are paid in HNY which sets a decent bit of selling pressure on the token
Do you guys think crowfunding could be a funding mechanism for ppDAO? Assuming we wouldn't need hips of $$$ we could be tapping into crypto enthusiasts that see the potentials in Precious Plastic. We would be venturing outside of our own community.
We could say we need xxx eth to get to stated goal.
We will spend xxx eth to do this, this and this which will get us to stated goal.
Supporters will get xxx PPC per eth donated.
Supporters would be supporting to: 1) make gains hoping PPC price would 100x in x yrs 2) support a project that could potentially real-life application of the whole crypto/dao world.
Yes definately. Could use something like Mirror, but the thing about it is that that's a one time crowdfund. Using the augmented bonding curve, we have continuous crowdfunding
Joseph
Yes definately. Could use something like Mirror, but the thing about it is that that's a one time crowdfund. Using the augmented bonding curve, we have continuous crowdfunding
There was a faucet where anyone could get a bit of HNY every second day. I think that brought some people´s attention and some of then became contributors.
Joseph
Is it currently in the "public" phase of the ABC then?
we are using their platform in our workshop. It would be great if more and more PP workshops use it.
I hope the market for plastic credits becomes bigger soon DiatomDAO (https://discord.gg/bmvXmbzw) + empower (their credits are not onchain afaik) is a great combo.
In terms of collab for PP DAO, I guess we still have to think about it and develop a nice way where e.g. PPC has some utility(edited)
i'm looking for a doc or something stating their tokenomics
7:42 PM
though they're using olympus pro to offer the bonds
7:42 PM
i don't think they have a bonding curve in the token itself
7:43 PM
and now that i think about it there a some risks or details that concern me about the project, like who verifies the plastic removal in step 3? someone could potentially mark stuff as verified and mint a bunch of PRC
7:45 PM
i get they're a new project but honestly raising 8M without clear documentation on the process (maybe i don't know where to look for it) feels weird
and now that i think about it there a some risks or details that concern me about the project, like who verifies the plastic removal in step 3? someone could potentially mark stuff as verified and mint a bunch of PRC
KlimaDAO is a fork of OHM, but their token is backed by carbon credits BCT from toucan protocol, which In turn come from offchain credits (verra I think).
In empower the verification of plastic credits is indeed centralized. I don’t know about PRC
you offer tokens at discount and receive stablecoins or other stuff
8:06 PM
similar to the ABC
8:07 PM
but (i think) usually one refers to tokens having bonding curves when they're implemented in the tokenomics of the token itself
8:07 PM
e.g. TEC emissions depend on the ABC
8:07 PM
whereas you can have a token with limited supply and offer bonds using an app like olympus pro
1
Mettodo | Njombe Beyond
KlimaDAO is a fork of OHM, but their token is backed by carbon credits BCT from toucan protocol, which In turn come from offchain credits (verra I think).
In empower the verification of plastic credits is indeed centralized. I don’t know about PRC
yeah, treasury building has become more and more important
8:16 PM
oftentimes projects spend big on farming programs which puts a lot of selling pressure and doesn't ensure liquidity for extended periods of time
1
8:16 PM
if a community can manage to own their liquidity they no longer have to worry about investors being able to buy or sell the tokens without too much slipagge
1
8:17 PM
1Hive now owns HNY-FOX and HNY-BRIGHT thanks to partnerships with communities
enti
if a community can manage to own their liquidity they no longer have to worry about investors being able to buy or sell the tokens without too much slipagge
Proposal Title The Initial Buy-in Proposal Information Signal your favour for this proposal on Snapshot We want to be the first buyers on our Augmented Bonding Curve (ABC)! This proposal aims to acquire TEC tokens at the moment of initialization of the ABC in order to allow the TEC to acquire tokens at the lowest possible price for key allo...
In case you missed it:
@thegrifft talks with @CamiRusso of @DefiantNews about replacing monopolistic government services with competing #RegenEconomies
Full video:
https://t.co/k3iTpFX1zghttps://t.co/WYiOUBd1Uf
enti
you likely want to keep the common pool with much funds as possible and get people to trade TEC separately
from what I understand the ABC can reduce the volatility of the token and ensures liquidity. When there is enough liquidity on secondary markets and an economy is created around the token you may want to let it "fly free"
That's pretty interesting. Never thought of shutting off the ABC. Makes sense though
But indeed I think the liquidity mechanism is such an important thing for a project like ours. I would assume quite low liquidity.(edited)
Hey guys I have been adding a few post-its on the Miro board (https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVOPvsqZ4=/) about PP´s purpose. Would be great to get your input, specially from @deleted-role
Do you guys know if these statements below correct?
When someone buys TEC from the TEC commons website - they are interacting with the ABC smart contract, so new TEC is being minted.
When someone buys TEC on Honeyswap, they are buying already minted tokens from the ABC
Joseph
Do you guys know if these statements below correct?
When someone buys TEC from the TEC commons website - they are interacting with the ABC smart contract, so new TEC is being minted.
When someone buys TEC on Honeyswap, they are buying already minted tokens from the ABC
exactly. That´s why the ABC is a kind of buffer that reduces volatility. If e.g. the price in secondary markets goes up, bots will buy TEC in the ABC and sell it in the secondary markets, thus reducing its price.
Former community manager of TheDao, co-founder at Giveth.io and CommonsStack. He is a crypto evangelist that holds the first ever master's degree on blockchain. Passionate about building software to support the growth of decentralized communities especially when they are non-profit causes.
Talking about the early days of Crypto, TheDAO hack, goi...
Do you know about Grassroot´s Economics work with Community currencies? This short docu is great: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojFPrVvpraU
In the podcast I shared, Griff explains how crazy it was that when the ethereum fork happened everyone won: ethereum "classic" and ethereum kept their value and thus, both the hackers and the white hackers had what they wanted. This (creating money out of nothing) is a somehow weird phenomenon. And from my little understanding it is related to our perception of what money is.
There is this great article by Brett Scott where he explains the commodity and the credit theories of money: https://brettscott.substack.com/p/money-through-mowglis-eyes
From my understanding, most of what we are discussing
(and most of the crypto space) holds a commodity theory of money. Yesterday I thought that it would be great to include a bit of credit theory of money in this project (PP).
Here a couple of blockchain projects with this credit-theory vision: https://trustlines.network/, https://resource.finance/
2
7:15 PM
Sorry for that No need to take it too seriously.
Is any of you up for working on the miro board tomorrow https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVOPvsqZ4=/ and discussing next steps?(edited)
Mettodo | Njombe Beyond
Sorry for that No need to take it too seriously.
Is any of you up for working on the miro board tomorrow https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVOPvsqZ4=/ and discussing next steps? (edited)
We can start with the first canvas ("ecosystem´s purpose" on the top left corner).
Mettodo | Njombe Beyond
Do you know about Grassroot´s Economics work with Community currencies? This short docu is great: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojFPrVvpraU
In the podcast I shared, Griff explains how crazy it was that when the ethereum fork happened everyone won: ethereum "classic" and ethereum kept their value and thus, both the hackers and the white hackers had what they wanted. This (creating money out of nothing) is a somehow weird phenomenon. And from my little understanding it is related to our perception of what money is.
There is this great article by Brett Scott where he explains the commodity and the credit theories of money: https://brettscott.substack.com/p/money-through-mowglis-eyes
From my understanding, most of what we are discussing
(and most of the crypto space) holds a commodity theory of money. Yesterday I thought that it would be great to include a bit of credit theory of money in this project (PP).
Here a couple of blockchain projects with this credit-theory vision: https://trustlines.network/, https://resource.finance/
I watched it as well, it was really good. Particularly the simulation on how not being able to loan keep the money fairly equally distributed.
10:41 AM
Apparently, there was another local money in Kenya, based on trash collection : "The settlement held a large trash disposal event, in which local youths were given five Eco-Pesa for each trash bag they filled (the trash was ultimately sent by truck or hand-cart to the nearest landfill). They spent this cash at local businesses, which could either use it to buy goods or services from other local sellers or exchange it for shillings. After three months with the Eco-Pesa, the monthly income of businesses in Kongowea had risen by 22%, and the settlement had rid itself of 20 tonnes of trash."
Had a meeting with https://www.empower.eco/ CEO yesterday. Super cool guy and they are very keen to work with us . They are building their own blockchain (using Cosmos SDK) to specifically host token projects around waste mgmt. They already have some good traction with their current plastic tracking products (16 employees). No next steps atm bc I said we are slowly getting our ideas together and they are still building their blockchain.(edited)
Listen to this episode from Bankless on Spotify. Vitalik Buterin is the founder of Ethereum and a researcher at the Ethereum Foundation. As the visionary behind the network, Vitalik's values are embodied within the ethos of Ethereum's community-centric nature. Exploring quadratic funding, pluralism, and sybil resistance, we dive into why Vitali...
In 2019, DAOhaus was born out of a community building coordination tools for themselves. Originally called Pokemol, it was a simple user interface to manage membership, voting and proposals for Moloch DAOs. As more communities were drawn to Moloch DAOs and required a no-code way to summon new DAOs, we built the original DAOhaus app.
Listen to this episode from Collectively Intelligent on Spotify. Two of our hosts, Jack du Rose (CEO & Founder of Colony) & Aron Fischer (recovering mathematician & co-author of the Colony whitepaper) sit down to discuss the story of Colony. What is Colony trying to solve? What have they learned along the way? Having worked on the challenges of ...
Web3 projects should be designed around a two-token system—one signaling reputation, the other for liquidity—that would represent people's contributions.
@enti according to the above podcast there is a different btw token and reputation. A token is linear to a degree where early contributors probably have the biggest shares. That is hard to reverse I think. If your voting is solely based on tokens you'd end up with a fairly vertical system where either whales or original team members can have most decisional power.
Reputation in the other hand (on colony at least) is sort of up to date as it is earned equally amongst people across sub-projects (dev, bazar, discord etc..) and additionally it decays meaning that if you haven't contributed in a while your reputation (and consequentially your voting weight) gets reduced in an effort to give power to the people currently active.
1:50 PM
Say someone started Precious Plastic in 2016 and we already had tokens. And say they'd be given 1000PPC coins at the time worth 100e. 6 years pass, token price goes up while they stop working on Precious Plastic. Assuming an important vote comes up they might have a advantage conpared to people starting in 2021 solely because of being an early adopter which doesn't necessarily make them more vested in the project in 2022 when people starting a pp project only get 10PPC as the price skyrocketed
1:51 PM
Probably probably an overly dumbized example, sorry
and that is a great solution to a problem i don't think exists or that is solvable with that
2:00 PM
on a personal note i'm not convinced yet on reputation
2:02 PM
taking on your example, early contributors recibe more PPC tokens but they also take on more risk, thus providing more relative value (it's not the same to do idk accounting taking the risk than doing accounting when you know you're getting paid)
2:03 PM
it's unlikely that you just stop contributing or paying attention to a project you are invested in and imo there's some risk involved with those reputation systems because they remove utilities from the primary token
2:03 PM
i could technically sell all or most my PPC as long as i keep working because it's no longer the primary governance source for example
I think at Precious Plastic we'd be in a special position where we'd actually have utility beyond voting power or speculation. PPC could be used across our ecosystem to exchange products and machines, reward contributions and more.
yeah i guess it makes sense if you separate governance from the economy but then other question arises, aren't economic contributions valuable on its own?
2:07 PM
this is just me wondering stuff and circling through ideas but like if i don't have the time to contribute but i have the funds, shouldn't i be given voice on the decision making?
2:11 PM
I’m not sure about this but I think those systems can’t be considered commons or public goods but some sort of cooperative board
enti
this is just me wondering stuff and circling through ideas but like if i don't have the time to contribute but i have the funds, shouldn't i be given voice on the decision making?
I think colony makes more sense for subDAOs where like if you set up a decentralized accountability department or something like that for PP it makes sense to be governed by reputation
2:36 PM
Or having some particular decisions or access to some delicate stuff based on reputation
I think it is intended as an additional layer to tokens
3:30 PM
One thing I am scared about is to impose an economy over a community historically known for its grassroot/reactionary/anarchist viewpoints
3:31 PM
I think we might gain to have a blend, avoiding to go from zero-financial-everything-free-we-love-the-world-no-need-no-money to a reality built upon the idea that everything is tokenizable
I didn't check what ABC means here, so the answer might be there.
Your example is really interesting Mattia, but this is based on a huge speculation that would "skyrocket" the tokens, and transform the early adopter in whales. (I also need to listen the podcast, I kept it for tonight).
But isn't there a way to avoid this unregulated speculation in the first time ? So the token can translate more thing than just money translation ?(edited)
Mattia
I think we might gain to have a blend, avoiding to go from zero-financial-everything-free-we-love-the-world-no-need-no-money to a reality built upon the idea that everything is tokenizable
interesting point, the PP community are the only ones that will decide that though you may be surprised, i've some anarchists that are really happy to be here
Yann
I didn't check what ABC means here, so the answer might be there.
Your example is really interesting Mattia, but this is based on a huge speculation that would "skyrocket" the tokens, and transform the early adopter in whales. (I also need to listen the podcast, I kept it for tonight).
But isn't there a way to avoid this unregulated speculation in the first time ? So the token can translate more thing than just money translation ? (edited)
because yeah it's a hard line to cross but the economic incentive is a huge benefit from tokenized structures and afaik one of the main reasons PP is looking into that
I would say up until now we've worked and hoped on people goodwill to push the project further and share learnings. It kind of worked to an extent. If you're cynical you could say it didn't work so much. Or that a huge potential has been lost as only a tiny fraction of the value and knowledge generated worldwide has been shared with the broader community. Maybe 1%.
4:10 PM
I think a token and a financial incentive would be a great driver to achieve greater sharings/contribution to the Precious Plastic ecosystem (even though I am still kinda sad financial incentives are the only thing working in late stage capitalism). For me this is one of the main goals of the DAO\
Yann
I didn't check what ABC means here, so the answer might be there.
Your example is really interesting Mattia, but this is based on a huge speculation that would "skyrocket" the tokens, and transform the early adopter in whales. (I also need to listen the podcast, I kept it for tonight).
But isn't there a way to avoid this unregulated speculation in the first time ? So the token can translate more thing than just money translation ? (edited)
If I had to list goals in priority order would be:
Transition to a community owned project where the community owns Precious Plastic and has a vested interest for it to succeed (people owns/earn tokens > they want the project to grow/succeed )
Increased contributions (people earn tokens for the IP and work they put in)
Precious Plastic treasury growth > more freedom of action and growth
Each participants value incentives need to be aligned with the benefit of the collectives. In current situation, it is not aligned
4:21 PM
@Yann I think you will find the ABC interesting. Basically instead of releasing a bunch of tokens into the free market, a smart contract regulates the minting of new tokens according to a function (can be linear, quadratic, sigmatic etc). The cost of the token invreases as more people buy in.
And the tokens could also be a money by itself ? Something you can buy or earn through your action, but that you can also use to exchange goods or services within the community.
4:22 PM
Do you have a "first entry" article to recommend about ABC ?
Yann
And the tokens could also be a money by itself ? Something you can buy or earn through your action, but that you can also use to exchange goods or services within the community.
And we can airdrop a first batch of tokens to past contributors ( all accounts on the community platform for example) so that the existing community is aligned from the beginning
Yann
And the tokens could also be a money by itself ? Something you can buy or earn through your action, but that you can also use to exchange goods or services within the community.
usually token communities mint X amount and leave some for a treasury, if the token prize goes up so does the available funds on the treasury
4:24 PM
but with the ABC you no longer need to do that, the money collected is whats used on the treasury to pay for expenses and the token is just for governance or other purposes
4:25 PM
though the token still has some speculation around it, it becomes more valuable as the community proves to provide more value
4:26 PM
as people will want to be involved in the decision making process
4:27 PM
at the end of the day thats the endgoal, unless theres an actual revenue generating product the token reflects how much people wants to govern the common
Listen to this episode from On The Other Side on Spotify. Danny Zuckerman from 3Box Labs talks about web3 identity, how tokenizing communities could potentially leave us worse off, and what it means to own your own identity. Check out Danny's thread on tokenized communities Follow Danny on Twitter (@dazuck) Follow 3Box on Twitter (@3boxlabs) ...
I agree with the criticism that money isn't the only incentive that motivates people. But I would argue that over the long run, it is the dominant one across a large group of people.
6:55 PM
And i would argue that the status quo in Precious Plastic is there is almost 0 people contributing. So there isn't much to mess up.
6:57 PM
Precious Plastic has always been primarily a top down, centralized creation and distribution of knowledge.(edited)
6:58 PM
Also tokenization is not just about money. It's also about shared ownership, governance, and incentive alignment.(edited)
7:01 PM
Commons stack for example talks a lot about the "cultural build" as part of tokenizing a community. I do think that is absolutely important. Gotta have the feeling of a community and the structures in place to nourish community and values.(edited)
My top reason would be to align the individual incentives of the community with the collective goal of the project(edited)
10:28 AM
2nd would be to develop a sustainable funding source for the project that doesn't rely on external input to the system (from people or entities that are not involved)(edited)
Joseph
My top reason would be to align the individual incentives of the community with the collective goal of the project (edited)
Funding the Commons is a virtual summit for individuals and organizations building new models of sustainable public goods funding and value alignment in open source networks.
1
enti
all these details we're talking about are nice discussions but it's not the right starting point
starting from the bottom up (community/cultural building, then tokenomics and such) instead of starting from the top which is pretty much what we've been discussing
https://www.ecobricks.org/brikcoins/ I found this randomly while I was looking for different brick making process. This is different than what we are looking for, but still fun : a manually done blockchain, to authenticate and reward people segregating plastic away from the environment.
this goes to show how new we're (I am) into the space
Yann
https://www.ecobricks.org/brikcoins/ I found this randomly while I was looking for different brick making process. This is different than what we are looking for, but still fun : a manually done blockchain, to authenticate and reward people segregating plastic away from the environment.
cool.. I think this page is also interesting.. https://www.gobrik.com/#offset/ plastic offset is an interesting concept we could also use to drive PPC demand up from external sources.
10:07 AM
I've been thinking about this and spoke with @Joseph extensively about the option of Precious Plastic to become a carbon offset org with the logic being every kg recycled > is a kg of CO2 stored in oil field or not generated > people could offset their carbon by buying PPC or specific kg of plastic recycled
1
Mattia
cool.. I think this page is also interesting.. https://www.gobrik.com/#offset/ plastic offset is an interesting concept we could also use to drive PPC demand up from external sources.
https://www.ecobricks.org/brikcoins/ I found this randomly while I was looking for different brick making process. This is different than what we are looking for, but still fun : a manually done blockchain, to authenticate and reward people segregating plastic away from the environment.
nice! I think we could explore how to plug this into PPC
enti
starting from the bottom up (community/cultural building, then tokenomics and such) instead of starting from the top which is pretty much what we've been discussing
Yesterday, I talked with Mike from Long Tail Financial (https://www.longtail.financial/). I think they are used to working with clients (vs partners) and he would like to talk with someone from the core team.
I think they have technical knowledge (modelling and deployment) that will be needed at some point, but echoing what @enti says I think there is a lot of "soft" work to be done beforehand.
In this regard, @enti I think the canvases in Miro ( https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVOPvsqZ4=/) (I feel super stubborn with this ) are a great way to map what is already existing. Because although as @Joseph mentioned PP has been top down centralised, there is already a big "community" with a lot of interactions happening.
1
Mettodo | Njombe Beyond
What next step shall we take to work on the "cultural build"?
tough call, i can make some assumptions but frankly i've never been involved in the process of building (crypto oriented) culture from scratch, much less a project that's already running and of a decent size
4:42 PM
what i'm thinking is pretty much getting people involved, making some workshops/meetings where PP can collectively discuss the cultural foundation of a collectively owned PP
1
4:45 PM
i was involved in a call just yesterday from some folks setting up RnDAO (Research & Development DAO) and they were just discussing what consensus meant for them, how should they make decisions, etc. here some of the stuff they were discussing:(edited)
4:45 PM
1
4:47 PM
with the size of PP may be worth as well to knock some doors and see if anyone with relevant experience on the space would be interested/available to join
enti
tough call, i can make some assumptions but frankly i've never been involved in the process of building (crypto oriented) culture from scratch, much less a project that's already running and of a decent size
with the size of PP may be worth as well to knock some doors and see if anyone with relevant experience on the space would be interested/available to join
Shall we meet some day next week to decide next steps and assign them to people?
Mettodo | Njombe Beyond
Yesterday, I talked with Mike from Long Tail Financial (https://www.longtail.financial/). I think they are used to working with clients (vs partners) and he would like to talk with someone from the core team.
I think they have technical knowledge (modelling and deployment) that will be needed at some point, but echoing what @enti says I think there is a lot of "soft" work to be done beforehand.
In this regard, @enti I think the canvases in Miro ( https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVOPvsqZ4=/) (I feel super stubborn with this ) are a great way to map what is already existing. Because although as @Joseph mentioned PP has been top down centralised, there is already a big "community" with a lot of interactions happening.
Key Assets needed Funding Giveth, Gitcoin (+Panvala for matching on donations) Mirror Sovereign nature initiative Grants Earth fund POPcorn Interchain foundation Harmony ESP Small grants (up to 30k) Project grant (no cap) Accelerator Seedclub Metapod Kernel Token engineering academy Legal assis...
Just sharing a few concerns with the technology and teams. Blockchain and crypto in general is super interesting. At the same time I feel like it is such a fast moving world like I probably never seen before. Few top projects. Hundreds of mediocre moonshots. My worry is to get into this relying on tools that will be dead or discontinued in a matter of years/months.
Take for examle SourceCred, been liked to it repeatedly over the past months as a good example of a blockchain project. Looking at it I got super hyped. Looking deeper into it they seem to be in a bit of a crisis (already‼⁇) with seemingly lack of direction, not funding to pay the team and so on. My worry is that we jump start with a stack of tools which are so new and unstable that could fuck us over in no time.
Maybe I'm being overly cautious (maybe cause I'm becoming a dad in a few weeks ) but these are some of the worries going through my head when tinkering about this.
3:00 PM
For reference, at Precious Plastic we've been historically very conservative with our techstack only using tools, platforms and frameworks once they were solid and long proved. Not saying this is a good thing or that we should continue as such. Just providing some context here.
1
1
Mattia
Just sharing a few concerns with the technology and teams. Blockchain and crypto in general is super interesting. At the same time I feel like it is such a fast moving world like I probably never seen before. Few top projects. Hundreds of mediocre moonshots. My worry is to get into this relying on tools that will be dead or discontinued in a matter of years/months.
Take for examle SourceCred, been liked to it repeatedly over the past months as a good example of a blockchain project. Looking at it I got super hyped. Looking deeper into it they seem to be in a bit of a crisis (already‼⁇) with seemingly lack of direction, not funding to pay the team and so on. My worry is that we jump start with a stack of tools which are so new and unstable that could fuck us over in no time.
Maybe I'm being overly cautious (maybe cause I'm becoming a dad in a few weeks ) but these are some of the worries going through my head when tinkering about this.
Yeah that's understandable, I must clarify that one advantage of these systems is that you aren't really tied to a "tool", you usually can transfer permissions say from Aragon to Gardens but yeah there's still a lot of room for improvement on the space
5:14 PM
congrats btw!
Joseph
Commons stack for example talks a lot about the "cultural build" as part of tokenizing a community. I do think that is absolutely important. Gotta have the feeling of a community and the structures in place to nourish community and values. (edited)
some kind of build contest would be super cool with all your creators as an 'onboarding event'! It could be an annual hit!
freak machine builds, handy new products. a real odyssey of the mind ... idk ... i feel like you all have no shortage of creativity...
it would be an excuse to generate and strengthen stable cultural value ties and account for fresh and existing value
the up and coming voting and funding mechanism will get a good trial to vote for winners
there'll be some kind of distribution method for your fungible anyway ... if you can cleverly account for existing community value while you distribute, it will be a hit even after the speculation bubble. A contest is a good framework for distributing funds without making it about the money while also not just handing it out.
if there's nonfungibles (to account for the new freak machines ) -- maybe make it part of the odyssey of the mind adventure contest to mint the details of the new product or machine creations. now all of a sudden everyone will want to know what an nft is because they will realize, amongst many other things, it's like a modern poor man's patent. a robo-notary that's always open.
the flow from fungible to non fungible and back again is what value exchange is all about
just my 2 cents - So cool to see you all opening the floor up to these talks!
Start your DAO day
Discover how to harness the power of community with #DAOs from the industry pioneers
Today's panel: "DAOS AND PURPOSEFUL COMMUNITIES" features @TheLAOOfficial @AssangeDAO @joincolony @DXdao_ @Givethio @daostack
Begins 19 CET 14 EST
https://t.co/9XGCGuZ6Bahttps://t.co/F6HbepJiKU
Hey guys! @enti and I agreed to meet this Thursday at 14 UTC+1 to discuss current situation and future steps. You are welcome to join!
There is no voice channel in this server, right? Would be great to have one
Hey guys! @enti and I agreed to meet this Thursday at 14 UTC+1 to discuss current situation and future steps. You are welcome to join!
There is no voice channel in this server, right? Would be great to have one
Yep I feel like some excuses a due to the team here.. we've been very slow that's what happens when you have limited resource, no funds and a small team.. gotta change that I believe Q2 will be more focused on DAO
1
8:13 AM
Talking about this, I am trying to redesign the Discord to better accommodate the growing needs of Precious Plastic, I would be curious to know what channels you'd like to have there. Voice channels you were saying, any other you think could be useful?(edited)
Joseph
Love this guys! Would totally join but I have covid at the moment and am simultaneously slammed with precious plastic work
Talking about this, I am trying to redesign the Discord to better accommodate the growing needs of Precious Plastic, I would be curious to know what channels you'd like to have there. Voice channels you were saying, any other you think could be useful? (edited)
Hello guys,
@enti and I have been discussing how we can move this process forward.
Enti heard from someone on Commons Stack that they plan to launch a second pilot by the end of the year, it would be great if PP was the selected pilot but still, we believe we can keep moving forward.
We can all keep researching how existing communities have worked in their "DAOfication" process, while we practice our own.
We thought we could set up two working groups:
Funding: looking for funding for the design process. (We think that at some point the work load will get bigger and funding will help us to keep working)
Org design: mapping what the current PP community looks like (including how the core @deleted-role works together) and collectively defining what we want to create (what are our shared values, definitions? How do we want to relate to each other? What is our shared purpose?, etc.)
And invite the whole PP community to join this process, through weekly calls on discord (we would have to select a time for this). These sessions can also be a place to share and solve doubts and to create a shared understanding about "crypto". Or we could organise some bi-weekly calls for this purpose.
We would like to know the core @deleted-role ´s opinion on this proposal and we would also suggest to make a "poll" to know if this is something the PP community wants to embark on or not (basically to make sure that there is not a big opposition to it)
1
1
Mettodo | Njombe Beyond
Hello guys,
@enti and I have been discussing how we can move this process forward.
Enti heard from someone on Commons Stack that they plan to launch a second pilot by the end of the year, it would be great if PP was the selected pilot but still, we believe we can keep moving forward.
We can all keep researching how existing communities have worked in their "DAOfication" process, while we practice our own.
We thought we could set up two working groups:
Funding: looking for funding for the design process. (We think that at some point the work load will get bigger and funding will help us to keep working)
Org design: mapping what the current PP community looks like (including how the core @deleted-role works together) and collectively defining what we want to create (what are our shared values, definitions? How do we want to relate to each other? What is our shared purpose?, etc.)
And invite the whole PP community to join this process, through weekly calls on discord (we would have to select a time for this). These sessions can also be a place to share and solve doubts and to create a shared understanding about "crypto". Or we could organise some bi-weekly calls for this purpose.
We would like to know the core @deleted-role ´s opinion on this proposal and we would also suggest to make a "poll" to know if this is something the PP community wants to embark on or not (basically to make sure that there is not a big opposition to it)
The Commons Stack will soon be launching The Commons Prize! Use this form to signal your interest in starting a Commons with dedicated support from Commons Stack.
I think I can speak for @Mettodo | Njombe Beyond and myself to say that please don't mind us lol we're just sharing ideas and thoughts. There's no rush and we don't want to be putting extra things on top of your work, you having covid, Mattia's newborn, etc. - we're just hyped!!
1
Joseph
Really sorry for the silence here - I just got over covid and @Mattia just had a baby!!!
@Mettodo | Njombe Beyond i like the idea. Open weekly call are good and would help keep up the momentum. I think if we would ask the community today without prior education there might be unnecessary resistance. We should start the calls and invite everyone interested. Learn as we go.
They said: We will be reaching out to applicants in April to share feedback and the next steps to submit your application for the Commons Prize.
I guess it would be good to apply ASAP (it takes 2 minutes)(edited)
i've heard of the term a couple of times but it's the first time i read about it, really good post
9:51 PM
there's something that particularly struck with me, Vitalik mentions a few times the need or fault of a system that inherently benefits miners/validators but doesn't have an structured and neutrally credible framework to pay developers
9:53 PM
imo it's important to notice at which layer of the implementation do you need that credible neutrality mechanism, a blockchain once deployed can run without a single dev interaction, but it can't without miners/validators
9:53 PM
does it mean it will succeed? most likely it won't but that's my point, each mechanism should be made on the pertinent layer of the system
9:54 PM
just wanted to share my thoughts around that, i just thing it's important to know where to draw the line as to where core mechanisms may just be too much and make the system too complex
Web3 gives creators the chance to be born again over and over, discarding and circumventing limits or requirements for pre-existing identity, reputation, or experience
@unicornio welcome on board.. great to have your energy and enthusiasm. Coming at the right time with dao and tokenomic taking center stage in q2(edited)
I think seedclub is interesting and valuable, but more for the startup type DAO. Commons stack is in my opinion more aligned with us because they are focused on public goods and social impact
2
11:44 AM
Hey @Mettodo | Njombe Beyond , what are your thoughts from being inside the trusted seed? Do you think we would have a good chance in this nomination process?
Commons Prize Nomination Form Our answers in bluePART 1 Criteria: a. Must be a community focused on a common cause. * There are many great projects and products that can benefit from the support of a Commons but do not need to actually become a Commons themselves. A commons is a community o...
Hey @Mettodo | Njombe Beyond , what are your thoughts from being inside the trusted seed? Do you think we would have a good chance in this nomination process?
I have no "insider" info @enti is also a TS, right?
I read that "A Commons is a community or a coalition of projects that will together advance a particular mission benefiting a public good" and "mission-aligned projects or products can group together to launch a Commons to fund their shared mission such as DeSci, ReFi, UBI, Self Sovereign Identity, etc."
This made me think whether CS is looking for communities with a broader scope than PP
I think it is something worth asking @usamaahmed#9991
don’t want to make any compromises but I’d be down to put an hour aside every week or two weeks to get some people in a voice chat and talk about web3 if that helps
2
enti
What’s more important is that if PP has any chance that the Commons Stack don’t come here and find a non-receptive community
don’t want to make any compromises but I’d be down to put an hour aside every week or two weeks to get some people in a voice chat and talk about web3 if that helps
me too.. me and @Joseph have been trying to meet to kick off the basics but we (I manly) failed to keep it up. So it might actually be beneficial to open it up to more people to have more accountability and have a better chance at keeping these meetings up. @Joseph ?
I think our strong case is an already established community that wants to transition to DAO/crypto. I think there might be many chains out there that might actually be interested to test it out IRL.. All projects I see they start from zero. Our case would be slightly different, reverse engineering crypto into the project.
5:41 PM
Anyone knows of an established project successfully transitioning to cryptoeconomics and DAO?(edited)
Mattia
I think our strong case is an already established community that wants to transition to DAO/crypto. I think there might be many chains out there that might actually be interested to test it out IRL.. All projects I see they start from zero. Our case would be slightly different, reverse engineering crypto into the project.
there's probably plenty of digital open sources benefiting from web3 like NumFOCUS (a org that supports plenty of python libraries) that recently got a "grant" from the TEC
im just thinking if i were part of the Commons Stack team i'd like it because:
pretty cool project and mission with a demonstrated record
real chance and use cases to benefit from a web3 economy
good PR for the CS, just imagine the great news that could be made from the CS helping in bringing this (they seem to be wanting to adopt a business model where communities pay them to build a Commons so good PR is always appreciated)
i think you've accomplished a lot more than many of us could have done
enti
im just thinking if i were part of the Commons Stack team i'd like it because:
pretty cool project and mission with a demonstrated record
real chance and use cases to benefit from a web3 economy
good PR for the CS, just imagine the great news that could be made from the CS helping in bringing this (they seem to be wanting to adopt a business model where communities pay them to build a Commons so good PR is always appreciated)
I am going to post this in there right now:
Hey guys! Joseph here from Precious Plastic, an open source hardware community for plastic recycling. Around 600 organizations use our tech around the world to recycle plastic into new products. We are stoked on Commons Stack and your support for public goods, and are planning on applying to the Commons Stack Prize.
Our question for you is....is our community something that you think is a good candidate for the prize? We are an active community that supports the commons of our open source knowledge around plastic recycling ( machine blueprints, product designs, techniques for making products, supporting software, etc). However we are not a "crypto first" community, and we're wondering if that is a good or bad thing in your eyes. In our view, we'd love to be one of the first showcases of an impact DAO that is not crypto first, but solving a social/environmental problem in the real world.
What do you think?(edited)
6:07 PM
(basically i want to put our project in their faces ahead of the prize)
With a recycling commons you get talent from all projects around the world and a bigger sample of community that’s familiar with both recycling and web3 and PP would slowly integrate instead of transforming (which may or may not involve some resistance from the current community)
fair, i don't really have a good perception of the whole recycling landscape so sorry if i jump on incorrect assumptions
4:04 PM
but thinking about that, if PP opens as a commons i wonder if there's a way to attract users from other projects, particularly from the group that is also familiar with web3 so there's not AS much pressure for the current PP community to be elegible
4:04 PM
idk if that makes sense
enti
but thinking about that, if PP opens as a commons i wonder if there's a way to attract users from other projects, particularly from the group that is also familiar with web3 so there's not AS much pressure for the current PP community to be elegible
I am happy to help if needed. Feel free to add me to any calls/conversations.
Setting up a DAO is not rocket science.
All the guys that you have been talking to are very passionate about what they do and I have zero doubts that will do their best to provide direction to the PP team.(edited)
The climate crisis is a governance and coordination crisis. Could Decentralised Impact Organisations (DIOs) built on DAOs and ReFi for climate verification, staked commitments & collective action, be a solution?
2:17 PM
PP : a DAO or a DIO ?
unicornio
I am happy to help if needed. Feel free to add me to any calls/conversations.
Setting up a DAO is not rocket science.
All the guys that you have been talking to are very passionate about what they do and I have zero doubts that will do their best to provide direction to the PP team. (edited)
I actually have to disagree there putting up the DAO as far as minting a token and having a governance platform isn’t rocket science, but designing the DAO to be long lasting and ensure it has a real impact isn’t a easy task…
you guys would like the discussions at Omega surrounding the TE Consillience Library I think: https://discord.com/channels/810180621930070088/810180622634844202
jump in a weekly call and see what's going on.
they love to talk ethics and multidisciplinary library research with clever ways of loosening people up and creating bonds to find out what people really need
2
Mattia
Dunno someone we could jump on a call to talk things through? To gauge a bit their feelings about pp
In the end it is trusted seeds (around 400 people if I am not mistaken) voting to choose the commons. Thus, some marketing/ communications will not harm if we want to increase our chances of being selected
Specially when we make it into the 3-5 finalists
What is the status of fixing fashion and beyond plastic? Any chance they can be part of a coalition?
Sensorica is another potential partner for an open hardware coalition. I sent a message in their server ️(edited)
3
Jolly LaMa
you guys would like the discussions at Omega surrounding the TE Consillience Library I think: https://discord.com/channels/810180621930070088/810180622634844202
jump in a weekly call and see what's going on.
they love to talk ethics and multidisciplinary library research with clever ways of loosening people up and creating bonds to find out what people really need
I already put my availability, once everyone puts theirs in there we can chose the best time, pinging everyone who has been involved @Mettodo | Njombe Beyond@unicornio@Joseph@Jolly LaMa(edited)
3:59 PM
(if you make an account it will automatically send a calendar invitation once its scheduled)
This idea occurred to me at 2:00am on a Saturday as I scrolled through the COMP forum. Turns out it’s not a new idea. Proposal farming was first discussed (as far as I can tell) in June 2020 by James Waugh, which set the foundation for Fire Eyes DAO’s formal ‘Governance Mining’ proposal to Balancer in November 2020, yet somehow this concept has ...
it does need a bit of work but nothing too hard afaik, haven't done it and i'm not really familiar with the exact process so idk
1
8:26 PM
i've chatted a bit with someone from the project before, in any case i'm sure we can get some support or at least just set up a discussion to understand if it's the best fit
2
Mattia
Anyone here know a production ready tool to track community contributions for potential future airdrop?
TL;DR Atlantis World is building the Web3 social metaverse by connecting Web3 with social, gaming and education in one lightweight virtual world that’s accessible to everybody!
Curious about how to nominate a community for the #CommonsPrize?
Join our AMA on April 18th at 10:00 am EST / 4:00 pm CET. Our team members will be answering all your Qs.
Set your reminder & drop your questions below! ⤵️
⏰https://t.co/Zg3lbsoKiv
The community around the book GreenPilled - How Crypto Can Regenerate the World (available at https://greenpill.party) has envisioned that web3 has the potential to regenerate the world. With the GreenPilled book, we have established a digestible source of a priori knowledge (theoretical knowledge) of how we might use
+1
My goal for the next meeting is really to understand why the team is now considering a DAO.
What's the vision and the ethos.
For me this is the leadership from the core team I need to "get".(edited)
@unicornio cool you'll have plenty of that. @Joseph was sharing a presentation he put together regarding the whys.. somewhere at the beginning of this channel..
Here are five key lessons I learned from building a decentralized content engine from scratch that you can apply to leading or contributing to your DAO.
Based on a more classic shareholding manner, but they seems to be an example of what PP could do as a DAO / wide sharholding : https://www.time-planet.com/en/
i made a base on clarity so we can take notes and organise better, it's a web3 tool but a wallet isn't required to join, you can use an email as well https://app.clarity.so/invite-link/8zEOFLW16D
Connect your wallet, share token-gated documents, coordinate projects and proposals, track tasks, trade notes, and build your own personal Wikipedia—in a familiar all-in-one workspace.
i must add to the commons stack funding process that wether you're a trusted seed or not if you contributed to the building of the community you get some "hatch tokens" that can be redeemed once the real token launches
1
6:32 PM
so everyone gets compensated for their distributions
its comes in different flavours... the common stack approach can be considered fair launch, Balancers LBP too, Copper too, Otonomos... most recently layer zero did one for stargate platform that is one of my favourites
2:31 PM
lol, sorry.... all fair launches with significant details in the process. Baby steps
2:34 PM
On a different note, from @Joseph mainly, from what i got yesterday, Its important to understand the existing money and work flows between the different elements that make PP open source project. Without that diagram(s) its is more difficult to imagine how the ecosystem can be (re?)modeled with a DAO + own token.(edited)
unicornio
On a different note, from @Joseph mainly, from what i got yesterday, Its important to understand the existing money and work flows between the different elements that make PP open source project. Without that diagram(s) its is more difficult to imagine how the ecosystem can be (re?)modeled with a DAO + own token. (edited)
I think we could structure the weekly meeting with 30mins of education with nice-to-know stuff and the rest 30 putting together some action items to move things forward
3:04 PM
Like the fair launches, governance methods or idk
3:05 PM
You seem to have done a lot of research already so may not be as useful
Hey guys.. we're doing a bit of house keeping here on Discord. Am gonna post a message which will get pinned for new users to better navigate Discord. Feel free to ignore.
The DAO Work Group is exploring the feasibility of turning Precious Plastic into a DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) where the community itself owns and governs Precious Plastic. If everything goes well, this channel is also where we’ll coordinate the work to make the DAO a reality.
Goals
Understand if Precious Plastic can actually be turned into a DAO and whether that will have positive sum outcomes towards the Precious Plastic's goal of ending plastic waste.
Decide whether Precious Plastic should become a DAO
If positive, draft a plan and roadmap to transform Precious Plastic into a DAO
Implement all the necessary infrastructure changes
♀️Steward
The current steward of this channel is @MattiaHow it works
1. The steward coordinates, moderates and guide the efforts to materialize the DAO
2. @DAO Contributor contributes with their blockchain expertise and knowledge
3. The DAO Work Group meets every Thursday 5pm CET in the #meeting-room
Research
The process of turning Precious Plastic into a DAO will be documented here
https://community.preciousplastic.com/research/turn-precious-plastic-into-a-daoRules
Same rules as One Army apply so let’s just be nice and respect each other
How to join
1. Send a DM to @Mattia with who you are, what you will bring and number of hours/week you can help(edited)
Hey guys was trying to put together a bit of a recap from last week meeting to help us move forward. Collating from my own notes and @enti on clarity
Good points:
Legally it is not possible to mint a token with current setup
Define the token utility to align the interest of everyone
We need validation from the community and public scrutiny
We should aim for a Fair Launch without presales
Questions that need answers:
Why having the coin helps grow community?
What is the DAO relationship with LDA?
Who is in the DAO?
How people fit in the governance?
How do we reward everyone that have worked on Precious Plastic up until now?
Few things seems high priority:
Gain 100% consensus from the team (hard one ) @Joseph
Pros and Cons of transitioning to a DAO @Mattia
Outline relationship between PP and LDA @Joseph
Mattia
Hey guys was trying to put together a bit of a recap from last week meeting to help us move forward. Collating from my own notes and @enti on clarity
Good points:
Legally it is not possible to mint a token with current setup
Define the token utility to align the interest of everyone
We need validation from the community and public scrutiny
We should aim for a Fair Launch without presales
Questions that need answers:
Why having the coin helps grow community?
What is the DAO relationship with LDA?
Who is in the DAO?
How people fit in the governance?
How do we reward everyone that have worked on Precious Plastic up until now?
Few things seems high priority:
Gain 100% consensus from the team (hard one ) @Joseph
@Mattia amazing summary of where the discussion stands.
Let me know if I can be of help regarding having 200% consensus from the team, which I see related to the pros and cons of transitioning/adding a DAO to the current open-source structure.(edited)
10:30 AM
It would be a good start if we can understand what are the friction points and bottlenecks that the core team is afraid of. Let's find out if they are legit or can be overcome.
It's time for a new chapter.
Scaling the technology alone is not enough. We have a duty to scale our values along with our networks.
In pursuit of this mission, we are excited to announce the Optimism Collective.
3:21 PM
This is a governance experiment to watch out for, arguably one of the best/most interesting structures out there
missed the airdrop only used it once to stake ETH but needs more than 1 transaction to receive airdrop
3:40 PM
Yep vitalik has always been against coin voting.. I am personally not a huge fan either.. most token holder are not necessarily the ones in the best position to make decision..
3:44 PM
In our case I could see anyone on the Precious Plastic map (except simple members) having one vote (these are the people which will be affected by decisions).. potentially token holder with more than X tokens could also have 1 vote.
Assuming anyone on the map has invested at least 10.000usd to get set up we could put that has the threshold for tokenholders
3:45 PM
are those types of hybrids possible from a tech perspective? @enti@unicornio
3:45 PM
I think merging the on-chain with RL credentials is where this would get real interesting
Mattia
are those types of hybrids possible from a tech perspective? @enti@unicornio
One thing you could do (and something the TEC seems to be interested in exploring) is dividing the votes and how you vote, which is similar to Optimism's approach
4:03 PM
so you can have a primary common pool governed by tokens and a snapshot strategy for other decisions
4:03 PM
with snapshot you can either mint NFTs so 1 person = 1 vote OR use a reputation system so the voting weight of the individuals increases as their reputation and involvement increases
the only thing i don't like about reputation (or that i rather see on reputation systems) is some sort of decay, if you stop being active your reputation should decrease as well
4:12 PM
i also find reputation on the broad dao level not as compelling, you may have a great reputation on one subDAO/Working Group and a bad one in another
enti
the only thing i don't like about reputation (or that i rather see on reputation systems) is some sort of decay, if you stop being active your reputation should decrease as well
This!
You got it, PP has the privilege of being able to mix onchain and IRL.
What optimist is doing is good, and Salome and I worked on something that might also give you more ideas. We called it "Governance minting":
https://twitter.com/SalomeBernhart/status/1487392476293996550
TLDR;
Governance Minting
Inspired by @JacobPPhillips Governance Mining, and on my 1st anniversary of joining @idlefinance and more recently working for @YieldGuild I want to introduce the idea of Governance Minting #GovernanceMinting
2
Joseph
yeah i think so many features still need to be built to really realize the viison
hmm, that's interesting, iirc colony is one of the oldest projects and they still don't seem to figure stuff out
unicornio
This!
You got it, PP has the privilege of being able to mix onchain and IRL.
What optimist is doing is good, and Salome and I worked on something that might also give you more ideas. We called it "Governance minting":
https://twitter.com/SalomeBernhart/status/1487392476293996550
+1
From a tech point of view everything is possible but ideally (safety comes to mind) you want to use tools that are already out there, audited and being actively developed.
Another one for review is : https://www.charged.fi/
where you can have NFTs that can also hold DeFi primitives, time locks, memberships, reputation and other cool tricks that might make sense for a IRL DAO like PP.
Hey team! So today me and @Joseph will meet to work on the high priority tasks outlines last week (https://discord.com/channels/586676777334865928/836898552046944256/968765710891376640)
I don't think there is need for externals to join as it will be highly specific to our existing team and structure.
However, if interested you can join here (trying out this web3 meet alternative)
app.huddle01.com/room?roomId=3vxdxem1(edited)
Hey guys finally managed to read a 1 year's worth of information and have been digesting it Looking forward to be present on the next meeting and give a contribution
2
Maker Island ☠ Leão
Hey guys finally managed to read a 1 year's worth of information and have been digesting it Looking forward to be present on the next meeting and give a contribution
it's really cool indeed, albeit we're far from "conviction consensus"
1:57 AM
though there's a new one under development "fluid proposals"
1:58 AM
instead of receiving the bulk of a proposal when it reaches the threshold, the conviction dictates how open is the token stream and you slowly receive the amount of the proposal
Protocol built on top of Superfluid Finance and Conviction Voting to create and regulate project funding streams based on the interest a community has in them. Community preference is revealed continuously, since tokenholders are able to change their stake at any moment.
Heya!
Together with this Discord channel we will maintain a research topic on the Community Platform to keep track of the process and gather information in a more organized manner (that's the hope )
You can find the topic here: https://community.preciousplastic.com/research/turn-precious-plastic-into-a-dao (let me know if you can access it, might need beta rights)
This is the very beginning but am aiming at making it more for pros like yourselves. For now is just a collection of primordial steps into research. Useful resources for the DAO group. If you happen to have good links, articles, yt channels or the likes make sure to comment on each steps.
An important one where I would love some inputs and resources is the "Blockchain & the environment" step, I would like to create a comprehensive and compelling case in favour of blockchains as I can envision the question coming up over and over again as we develop this from our community.
️ Also if you spot anything majorly wrong let me know (edited)
2
1
1
1
1
Mattia
Heya!
Together with this Discord channel we will maintain a research topic on the Community Platform to keep track of the process and gather information in a more organized manner (that's the hope )
You can find the topic here: https://community.preciousplastic.com/research/turn-precious-plastic-into-a-dao (let me know if you can access it, might need beta rights)
This is the very beginning but am aiming at making it more for pros like yourselves. For now is just a collection of primordial steps into research. Useful resources for the DAO group. If you happen to have good links, articles, yt channels or the likes make sure to comment on each steps.
An important one where I would love some inputs and resources is the "Blockchain & the environment" step, I would like to create a comprehensive and compelling case in favour of blockchains as I can envision the question coming up over and over again as we develop this from our community.
️ Also if you spot anything majorly wrong let me know (edited)
Hey Mattia, I saw your post looking for input & resources.
One that has served me well personally was binance academy.
They have everything in both text format & YT viddy's, with a lot of info, can check it out here
https://academy.binance.com/enhttps://www.youtube.com/c/BinanceAcademy
Besides that if you ever have a web3, blockchain related question hit me up. I have experience in the industry and if i can't answer your question i'll at least be able to refer you to someone who can
Besides that I wanted to give you another little tip:
The Blockchain/crypto community is not only on twitter but a lot of the inner workings (and very experienced developers) reside in the depths of various Telegram groups. Might be worthwhile to dig in that rabbit hole as well at some point
Cheers!
@MagicTurtle cheers for that! Of course, I completely forgot telegram ♂️ any you'd advise following? I find telegram even messier than discord thanks for all the links, looking forward to new rabbitholes.
Just curious could you reply to the posts? Would be great to post the bnb resources there
8:29 PM
@MagicTurtle if interested you could join tmw DAO call (5pm cet) trying to move forward and organise ourselves
I'm reading through their materials. Haven't heard of them before but it looks interesting. One thing you need to keep in mind is that you'll most likely be tied to their platform if you win the prize by the looks of it
That might be a good thing but you might wanna choose for a 'we'll figure it out ourselves' kinda way in order to not have ties to anything else but your own DAO.
Mattia
@MagicTurtle cheers for that! Of course, I completely forgot telegram ♂️ any you'd advise following? I find telegram even messier than discord thanks for all the links, looking forward to new rabbitholes.
Just curious could you reply to the posts? Would be great to post the bnb resources there
Sup! Yeah TG is very messy and fast-paced. It really depends on what you want. Most telegram groups are centered around finding new projects to 'invest' in. This can obviously range from the true 'degens & moonboy' groups to AMA groups or just groups of project/DAO owners that chat about everything and nothing.
How do I go about replying to the posts? Do you mean here on Discord or on the community.precious website's posts?
In regards to the meeting, would love to join but I have a shoot that day so i'll most likely still be in the studio at that time
MagicTurtle
I'm reading through their materials. Haven't heard of them before but it looks interesting. One thing you need to keep in mind is that you'll most likely be tied to their platform if you win the prize by the looks of it
That might be a good thing but you might wanna choose for a 'we'll figure it out ourselves' kinda way in order to not have ties to anything else but your own DAO.
Sorry yes you are right. What I tried to touch upon there is that their materials refer a lot to DAI, wxDAI & ETH. Especially in regards to their 'trusted seed' thing (sorry still reading up on it) What i'm wondering is if you'd be tied to a certain blockchain after winning their prizepool or not.
MagicTurtle
Sorry yes you are right. What I tried to touch upon there is that their materials refer a lot to DAI, wxDAI & ETH. Especially in regards to their 'trusted seed' thing (sorry still reading up on it) What i'm wondering is if you'd be tied to a certain blockchain after winning their prizepool or not.
I just recently became a Trusted Seed and my understanding so far is that they do not impose but help shape the community with a set of tools or “puzzle” from their partner communities and experts on the board
9:12 PM
Probably one of the top tools si Conviction Voting which is currently only used in Gardens from 1Hive and that’s just deployed on Gnosis Chain and Polygon
I guess it all depends on the needs of your particular DAO + the specific inner working of the blockchain you decide to use. But gnosis looks promising
never been active on twitter as pp, the time might have finally come
1
1
MagicTurtle
Sup! Yeah TG is very messy and fast-paced. It really depends on what you want. Most telegram groups are centered around finding new projects to 'invest' in. This can obviously range from the true 'degens & moonboy' groups to AMA groups or just groups of project/DAO owners that chat about everything and nothing.
How do I go about replying to the posts? Do you mean here on Discord or on the community.precious website's posts?
In regards to the meeting, would love to join but I have a shoot that day so i'll most likely still be in the studio at that time
hey lars ye I meant on the community platform post, starting the discussion there on the step to keep that as a more timeless knowledge that will be easy to search and retrieve for the years to come. Discord is easily gone
1
11:57 AM
Very curious if anyone has more compelling data and arguments to support the thesis that blockchain really ain't that bad from an environmental standpoint, particularly when compared with traditional banking system and POS transition.
Add your comments on the step here https://community.preciousplastic.com/research/turn-precious-plastic-into-a-dao
I'll add some in there when i have time! I know that there have been some studies and research papers regarding this + due to the competitive nature of PoW systems, most ate running on or turning towards renewables in order to keep their expenses down & make more profit. If anything, blockchain technology is partly responsible for the quick adaptation of renewables in the past few years.
Connect your wallet, share token-gated documents, coordinate projects and proposals, track tasks, trade notes, and build your own personal Wikipedia—in a familiar all-in-one workspace.
just saw the video, great work! got me really excited
6:12 PM
i'm just skeptical about the last part when you talk about what's in for the Commons Stack and they say what's in for them is a monstrous challenge they may not want to face lol
6:13 PM
i guess i would rather have something like there's really great upside/PR/benefits for the Commons Stack and their Trusted Seed as they're partering with and helping one of the biggest "web2 commons" transition into web3
2
6:13 PM
if that makes sense
enti
i'm just skeptical about the last part when you talk about what's in for the Commons Stack and they say what's in for them is a monstrous challenge they may not want to face lol
zero stress... baby steps. The more PP is "DAO ready", the easier it will be for CS to handle the launch
enti
i'm just skeptical about the last part when you talk about what's in for the Commons Stack and they say what's in for them is a monstrous challenge they may not want to face lol
What can be done, how to we bring to this channel key "opinion leaders", the most outstanding contributors from 10 yrs of PP?
7:09 PM
We must get them involved in the early stage.
enti
i guess i would rather have something like there's really great upside/PR/benefits for the Commons Stack and their Trusted Seed as they're partering with and helping one of the biggest "web2 commons" transition into web3
specially useful for the LDA bazaar and 2nd hand sales
11:09 AM
traceability comes to mind
11:16 AM
I am thinking if the PP token can be used to connect buyers directly to the DAO:
hardware designers, HW manufacturers, installers, service providers like procurement/maintenance/consulting and (later?) supply chain processes.
The PP DAO token can be used to protect intellectual property, source and track parts/machine production.(edited)
Yes! That's been raving in my mind. The token could help eventually trace the supply chain and potentially allow for a pp trademark where buyer can know full history of their recycled products
11:26 AM
Yes utility in the pp ecosystem can be applied in multiple places..
In this previous article, I talk about my immersion into DAOs.The approach I took to learn about them was to deep dive and collaborate on a few of them. I am still collaborating -and learning.
So reviewing some of the research materials I say I like the idea of a collective fund that allows everyone to have a say in how it's used. But I don't think we need any form of crypto to do that.
If you take the crypto out of the equation what you are left with is simply just non-dividend common stocks. Everyone buying them gets to have a vote and say in how the money is used.
I also really can't see how you are going to make this accessable to everyone. If everyone within precious plastics has a say in how the fund is used, even if they don't pay into it, then what's the point of having the stock portion or the crypto portion? But then if we restrict who gets a say in how the money fund is being used then is it really a free and democratic system? It would end up alienating pp members that don't or can't pay into it. Ends up making a class system where those that can't pay into it to get the rewards of it end up begging and pleading with those that have in an attempt to win favor and have the group invest in them.
So in one case where those that have a say buy into it, you get something filled with corruption, on the other case the whole basis of the crypto or stock side of it looses all meaning as you let all pp members have a say despite buying or not buying into it.
If PP really wants to make a storage of cash to help people out. I say just start a non-for-profit treasury account. People donate into it as they please, even customers might be able to donate to it too. And then as a collection by using surveys we vote on how to use the funds to help kinda like an angel investor to any of these small businesses and projects
Was good, did a 3min presentation had to leave before q&a also not a huge audience. Could be good join other timesloths
1
Wild_Inventor
So reviewing some of the research materials I say I like the idea of a collective fund that allows everyone to have a say in how it's used. But I don't think we need any form of crypto to do that.
If you take the crypto out of the equation what you are left with is simply just non-dividend common stocks. Everyone buying them gets to have a vote and say in how the money is used.
I also really can't see how you are going to make this accessable to everyone. If everyone within precious plastics has a say in how the fund is used, even if they don't pay into it, then what's the point of having the stock portion or the crypto portion? But then if we restrict who gets a say in how the money fund is being used then is it really a free and democratic system? It would end up alienating pp members that don't or can't pay into it. Ends up making a class system where those that can't pay into it to get the rewards of it end up begging and pleading with those that have in an attempt to win favor and have the group invest in them.
So in one case where those that have a say buy into it, you get something filled with corruption, on the other case the whole basis of the crypto or stock side of it looses all meaning as you let all pp members have a say despite buying or not buying into it.
If PP really wants to make a storage of cash to help people out. I say just start a non-for-profit treasury account. People donate into it as they please, even customers might be able to donate to it too. And then as a collection by using surveys we vote on how to use the funds to help kinda like an angel investor to any of these small businesses and projects
How would you make such system that can allow everyone at any part of the world signal their preferences in a trustless manner? Money plays a good part yeah but it's not even about money, it's about the collective ownership of a group that's across the whole world and the ability to let everyone contribute even if they're not part of the "core" team.
1
3:33 PM
I don't think crypto is needed for everything and as far as I can tell PP has been working decently fine so far, but with tools arising to better empower collective ownership and coordination I'm not sure why not just give them a shot
3:34 PM
some crypto projects are terrible and I know that's probably a concern of everyone (including me!) but if you skip that bs there's a lot of cool stuff and innovation going on
enti
How would you make such system that can allow everyone at any part of the world signal their preferences in a trustless manner? Money plays a good part yeah but it's not even about money, it's about the collective ownership of a group that's across the whole world and the ability to let everyone contribute even if they're not part of the "core" team.
Yes I agree there, I feel the whole money aspect of this should be left out unless it's something simple like an emergency fund thing.
If we want a collective ownership thing, I believe a stock market thing where stocks are held private and given to those that are part of the PP community will work better.
Wild_Inventor
Yes I agree there, I feel the whole money aspect of this should be left out unless it's something simple like an emergency fund thing.
If we want a collective ownership thing, I believe a stock market thing where stocks are held private and given to those that are part of the PP community will work better.
Yeah but unfortunately that's hard, first of all I believe that creates way higher costs and burdens for the current team and a lot of markets aren't as easy to manage stocks and PP is way too spread out in the world
3:38 PM
the crypto thing can work just as a stock if needed but there's way less overhead
Currently the systems that monitor the transactions of a crypto exchange need to use multiple PCs to keep track of and record transactions and ownership.
Has the process been reduced to a point where it can run on a single PC
Wild_Inventor
Currently the systems that monitor the transactions of a crypto exchange need to use multiple PCs to keep track of and record transactions and ownership.
Has the process been reduced to a point where it can run on a single PC
right, I mean (public) blockchains require a set of validators to confirm transactions by design - this ensures security as the redundancy of data across the globe makes it impossible to modify any record on the ledger
3:43 PM
that being said you as an individual don't need to run a validator if you don't want to
3:43 PM
there's plenty of wallets out there for you to access and manage your assets on the blockchain
would be really hard to make a trustless platform that's on control of a single entity
3:44 PM
well that would be really impossible lol
3:46 PM
but if your concerns are about the energy consumption of blockchains, there's plenty of them to choose that spend very little money per transaction, presumably less consumption that traditional banking systems
3:46 PM
the blockchain i use the most is offsetting 10x their organisational and network emissions
Why do we need all these heavy validators anyways?
Have not banks been doing this very same thing though with digital bank accounts?
We withdraw money from time, we deposit money in them. We spend directly form the account all digitally.
All that is really happening within the bank systems is that a set of binary data information that represents the amount of money in your account gets changed. And those changes are tied to a unique identification number.
If this has already been done successfully before, and the US dollar is no longer held to any physical stands it is now held to an arbitrary one set by a governing body. So the worth and denomination of such dollar information is also simply accounted for within the bank accounts as a set of binary digital code.
Then why don't we just use their systems for monitoring banks to monitor other forms of digital currency? The only thing that will change is the denominations and the unit of the money being but into the account?
Looking at it that way, isn't digital banking simply the original crypto?
I don't remember the exact number but somewhat about 80M usd were sent to Ukraine in crypto amidst the war, some banks we're falling behind, some banned, etc.
3:52 PM
and that's on a terrible case
3:53 PM
but day to day international transactions are costly and complicated
3:53 PM
not to mention that you're used as the product whereas on crypto everyone benefits from shared ownership
3:54 PM
are banks bad? nope, can you make a global layer of coordination with fairly low costs and high impact with them? definitely not
3:55 PM
on a more philosophical point, it's also a matter of trust, even if a traditional company could potentially make something like that (which I don't believe as there's way too much bureaucracy on global matters), they control the data, not you
1
3:56 PM
the larger the validator set the best protected is your information, I could as a wrongfully intended validator switch up the numbers and make it so i have 1B dollars but I would be immediately left out as the other set of validators can't confirm that's true
3:57 PM
and that's trusting a system that doesn't know anything but computational cryptography, not trusting if a government is being transparent enough to take care of business the way they should
I honestly find more trust in a company that is regulated and can be penalized if they mess up than an open source where a person can mess up. And even is it's caught right away what is the penalties for them doing that? What restrictions and punishments do they receive for doing the that?
I believe the regulations in place for things such as back and such are very much important and necessary for trust in the value of money, it's book keeping, and I e handling.
If banking is difficult then find a way to start a nonprofit banking system. One that has am practices that make money saving and distribution easier for the low income person. Have it included a friendly and educational component to it that way it can educate the public it serves in how it works and how to use it.
This in some degree has been done before with a start up that focuses on providing bank account access to low income people in places like Africa.
Tell us about the community that you are nominating Precious Plastic is an open hardware platform enabling people to start their own plastic recycling project anywhere in the world. To date the Pre...
Grants Round 14 is coming! It will take place from June 8 - 23.
If you have an existing grant and are looking to receive matching funds, it's a great time to review it and provide updates!
Your grant must be ‘active’ to be eligible to receive Matching Pool funding.
Question: can anyone get hurt/loose money with ABC or the token?
I want to make extra sure no one, and I mean no one, is loosing money because of this. Our community is into machines not finance, giving a them a powerful tool they don't know how to manage or handle and driven by hype and fomo could make lots of people loose money, and this I can't accept. Can we design a token system where no one gets hurt?
Thats only for the Trusted Seed of the Commons Stack Associaton
Mattia
Question: can anyone get hurt/loose money with ABC or the token?
I want to make extra sure no one, and I mean no one, is loosing money because of this. Our community is into machines not finance, giving a them a powerful tool they don't know how to manage or handle and driven by hype and fomo could make lots of people loose money, and this I can't accept. Can we design a token system where no one gets hurt?
Bonding curves are essentially a mechanism that allows the continual liquidity of a token, with the price changing depending on how much…
5:30 PM
Curves just help/facilitate executing the distribution.
Deciding (designing) how you want to distribute tokens between ALL PP participating actors is the 1st step and the most important one.
I do like this approach (progressive versioning) and @enti comment the other really made me think "you can launch a DAO without a token". The logic and strategies to have a DAO really don't need a token per say. However, I guess governance would need a token, wouldnt it?
Mattia
I do like this approach (progressive versioning) and @enti comment the other really made me think "you can launch a DAO without a token". The logic and strategies to have a DAO really don't need a token per say. However, I guess governance would need a token, wouldnt it?
One usually thinks of crypto governance as requiring a token, but why couldn't you use other methods of governance without tokens? Like idk Ethereum itself doesn't use tokens to make decisions
6:05 PM
and it's arguably the DAO of DAOs
6:06 PM
And we all can pretty much agree with the progressive approach and I think we've talked about that a few times already
6:07 PM
The Commons Strack built TEC that way, they spent like a year before putting the actual token together
Nothing stops pp from doing Governance mining with NFTs instead of minting a new coin.
7:31 PM
I remember you guys debating this topic a while ago.
7:35 PM
IMO, onboarding existing active pp members to the DAO should be a priority and the members that join the DAO should be rewarded in multiple ways (even if there is no coin).
1
7:37 PM
Onboarding is a multi step process... Each action toward bigger engagement/participation should be rewarded.
I agree that using NFTs to model your current governance structure, which seems to be delegated to a small group of people, and then progressively decentralizing will make things move faster.
Thank you all. Have been a fan of PP for a few years and helping to build a local workspace in our community makerspace. Injector done, extruder v2 and grinder almost done! Hoping a shift to web3 work will free up more time for IRL building, too.
1
1
enti
But ideally they don’t must have tokens to be part of the ecosystem and have a voice
Hey guys so picking up from last week's proposal from @unicornio we would now organize into 2 groups:
DAO workgroup @Mattia@Joseph@enti, maybe @Jon Simmons ?
Token workgroup @Mattia@Joseph@unicornio
I might add on @unicornio suggestion that we also need a macro workgroup focusing to inform the existing community on the existence of this DAO development channel and events to start onboard ppl on this conversation. Potentially just@Mattia and @Joseph for now.
Should we do a meeting for each? Or other asynch collaborative ways are better? I feel like we talk a lot and the time to produce ideas, presentations, documents has come to bring the conversation further.
Mattia
hey @unicornio this is still very vague to my untrained Could you think of a practical example of how this could work?
@unicornio makes a interesting point that I would like to also suggest. After reading all of the documentation of the initial discussions I had the feeling in the beginning there was a discussion between launching a PP token or a NFT but that conversation faded out. (Maybe because the token might be a better path decided after the online discussions).
As a PP user and having met several members and also as @Mattia & @Joseph mentioned several times, the community is mainly Designers and makers oriented so beginning as a token/dao right at the beginning it might be a step learning curve to get onboard and also have a collaborative approach to it as not everyone is a tech savvy person.
Maybe merging the two worlds might encourage more people to collaborate while at the same time working with the main skills we have in the community.
A NFT project that builds into a DAO might work in the world of PP as it works towards collective ownership, if the NFT brings key attributes into the project like this examples @Mattia :
VeeCon is a multi-day conference where only VeeFriends token holders will get to experience an extraordinary lineup of content, entertainment, competitions, gatherings, team sessions and more.
Explore the first decentralized metaverse that is built, governed, and owned by its users. Discover different districts, meet people, party at events, and more!
A more indepth example @Mattia is VeeCon that has several attributes to NFt's that I could see PP using.
One of the main ones that you and @Joseph already mentioned as a need is using NFT as a seed funding to afterwards build and invest on developers for the DAO.
depending on the rarity of the NFT you own you have certain benefits, 1-1 business calls to build your business plan with joseph, spend a week with the PP team, 1 lunch experience with Dave, Web Design support with Mattia, access to a PP conference in project kamp, early access to machine updates etc etc
Been thinking about this, now I’m not sure having those as separate groups right now is the best idea, my reasoning being that we have can’t design the pillars of the DAO and the token separately.
Are we going to design a token strategy to serve the purpose of a organizational design we dont have yet?
2:29 PM
We should first get some understanding (who are the stakeholders, what are the current dynamics of PP and which ones of them we don’t like, all the moving parts like the open source machines and the marketplace, etc.)
2:30 PM
Then on “iteration 0” the PP team exits to community opening some form of off-chain/informal advice process so everyone is included
2:30 PM
Iteration 1 first version of the DAO we start to introduce tokens as a means of coordination (wether they’re fungible or NFTs)
2:31 PM
Idk something like that is what I have in mind right now
Ok guys, made an event for tmw on Discord to slowly open up to the community as proposed by @unicorniohttps://discord.gg/dGSQuvrj?event=976503688665382973 I will take care of the agenda. Hope to see you all there (edited)
hello all, just joined the Discord a few weeks ago and stumbled on this interesting conversation... I came here because circular economy, but I actually work in the DWeb world in my day job.
If you all manage to wrap your heads around ABCs I would love to hear your explanations -- I'm friends with Jeff Emmett ( TEC core team, https://blog.goodaudience.com/rewriting-the-story-of-human-collaboration-c33a8a4cd5b8 ) and I still don't understand them
(Or, an Introduction to Token Bonding & Curation Markets)
1:00 AM
I'm kinda coming into this conversation like a bull in a china shop, not having read a lot of it. But I think it might be valuable for the token design workgroup to reach out to Sebnem Rusitschka -- she's a token engineer who's working with https://dada.art and has quite a different approach to much of the DeFi world. Less game theory, more human flourishing through cooperation. I suspect her approach might be quite compatible with the ethos of PP.(edited)
@pauldaoust welcome!! mind if I ask what are you currently working on?
About ABCs... I think of them as a smart contract to mint tokens with an added tribute function so wether you buy (mint) or sell (burn) tokens you're giving to the reserve of the protocol/DAO
3:09 AM
then you have the reserve which is what backs the token and a funding pool which is what the community uses to well, fund whatever they do
unicornio
next call is tomorrow right?
@Jon Simmons@Maker Island ☠ Leão can you guys make it?
@pauldaoust welcome to this working group ️thanks for all the links and inspiration. Hope you can make it today for the meeting so we can meet
pauldaoust
I'm kinda coming into this conversation like a bull in a china shop, not having read a lot of it. But I think it might be valuable for the token design workgroup to reach out to Sebnem Rusitschka -- she's a token engineer who's working with https://dada.art and has quite a different approach to much of the DeFi world. Less game theory, more human flourishing through cooperation. I suspect her approach might be quite compatible with the ethos of PP. (edited)
Ok guys, made an event for tmw on Discord to slowly open up to the community as proposed by @unicorniohttps://discord.gg/dGSQuvrj?event=976503688665382973 I will take care of the agenda. Hope to see you all there (edited)
@pauldaoust welcome!! mind if I ask what are you currently working on?
About ABCs... I think of them as a smart contract to mint tokens with an added tribute function so wether you buy (mint) or sell (burn) tokens you're giving to the reserve of the protocol/DAO
Yeah, happy to talk about it! I'm a technical writer for a project called Holochain https://holochain.org. It's not blockchain (despite the silly name); it's more like a toolkit for building everyday apps that don't need a server. Some fun apps being built right now, including a community-in-a-box app that's apparently going to be marketed to DAOs.
Thanks for that explanation, and it dredges up some rusty memories of things that Jeff has said to me. Sounds like it's meant to reward those who are committed to a community but also allow speculative investment, 'composting' that sort of relationship into benefits for the community. Does that sound right?
There is one concept from the minds of Commons Stack that I instantly got: conviction voting, sounds interesting. It uses what I guess you'd call a bonding curve that gives you more clout the longer you leave your vote the way it is.
I'm honoured to get an invitation when I only just joined -- unfortunately I'm on dad/gardening duty today. got to get the garden ready for planting tomatoes this weekend!
Yeah, happy to talk about it! I'm a technical writer for a project called Holochain https://holochain.org. It's not blockchain (despite the silly name); it's more like a toolkit for building everyday apps that don't need a server. Some fun apps being built right now, including a community-in-a-box app that's apparently going to be marketed to DAOs.
Thanks for that explanation, and it dredges up some rusty memories of things that Jeff has said to me. Sounds like it's meant to reward those who are committed to a community but also allow speculative investment, 'composting' that sort of relationship into benefits for the community. Does that sound right?
There is one concept from the minds of Commons Stack that I instantly got: conviction voting, sounds interesting. It uses what I guess you'd call a bonding curve that gives you more clout the longer you leave your vote the way it is.
Yup, that sounds about right! - it's also a great tool for small/mid size communities as they can choose anther currency to operate and back their token, like for example it has proven to be resilient towards the broader market movements (e.g. this market rundown hasn't affected the TEC much), which is pretty cool given that if we just had $TEC on our treasury under a more "normal" mechanism we would probably be in financial trouble right now.
And Conviction Voting is something I'm a huge fan of too!! I contributed to 1Hive for ~1 year - we were one of the first to use CV as our main decision making mechanism and the developers of https://gardensdao.eth.limo/ which is used by TEC, Giveth and other projects to govern their common pools as well. Really cool stuff going on.
12:57 AM
Both the ABC and CV are things that could fit Precious Plastic really well! That's a big piece of why they've decided to go after the Commons Stack's Prize
2
1
enti
Yup, that sounds about right! - it's also a great tool for small/mid size communities as they can choose anther currency to operate and back their token, like for example it has proven to be resilient towards the broader market movements (e.g. this market rundown hasn't affected the TEC much), which is pretty cool given that if we just had $TEC on our treasury under a more "normal" mechanism we would probably be in financial trouble right now.
And Conviction Voting is something I'm a huge fan of too!! I contributed to 1Hive for ~1 year - we were one of the first to use CV as our main decision making mechanism and the developers of https://gardensdao.eth.limo/ which is used by TEC, Giveth and other projects to govern their common pools as well. Really cool stuff going on.
This is encouraging to hear -- both that ABCs tend to buffer communities against the volatility of the market, and that you're still a fan of CV even after using it for a year. It speaks well of both these concepts if they're being used in real-world projects, are being enjoyed by participants, and are helping carve out niches of sanity in the unhinged world of crypto!(edited)
2
enti
then you have the reserve which is what backs the token and a funding pool which is what the community uses to well, fund whatever they do
ok so my lizard brain understands there are 2 places where money are held:
reserve where money coming in form ABC token sales are stored for future payback if everyone decided to sell the token
funding pool to be used by the project. How is this funded? Is this independent from ABC? Is this where buying/selling fees would end up? Can this be extend to other offchain revenue sources?
Mattia
ok so my lizard brain understands there are 2 places where money are held:
reserve where money coming in form ABC token sales are stored for future payback if everyone decided to sell the token
funding pool to be used by the project. How is this funded? Is this independent from ABC? Is this where buying/selling fees would end up? Can this be extend to other offchain revenue sources?
Yes correct.
Funding pool is funded by a tax when people buy Precious Plastic token through the ABC. If they donate/buy 100 xdai worth of PPC , a certain percentage goes to the funding pool. And same thing when they would sell their PPC. So I would say no it's not really independent.
What do you mean by extending it to off chain sources? Do you mean Bazar fees for example?(edited)
2
Joseph
Yes correct.
Funding pool is funded by a tax when people buy Precious Plastic token through the ABC. If they donate/buy 100 xdai worth of PPC , a certain percentage goes to the funding pool. And same thing when they would sell their PPC. So I would say no it's not really independent.
What do you mean by extending it to off chain sources? Do you mean Bazar fees for example? (edited)
Yeah sure, the common pool is the wallet the DAO used for everything on the high level, though those “off-chain” sources of income must go on-chain at some point and deposited into the common pool for the DAO to govern them
Hey guys I'm traveling to Portugal on Thursday, hence I anticipated the weekly meeting to Wednesday. Hope as many of you can make it
Agenda
Intro-What we are trying to achieve
Portugal-Week long web3 sprint in Ericeira + discord events
♀️ CS-current status and next steps
Gitcoin-Should we apply y/n?
️ Run channel as DAO?
@Jon Simmons do you think we could/should run this channel as smaller DAO leading up to the final PP DAO? A bit how each pod in orca is an individual entity with their own teams, multisig, processes and mgmt?
Hey @DAO Contributors so we got through the first phase of Common Stack price Well done everyone that chipped in For the next and final phase we need to answer to the following questions with a video by.. TOMORROW
Here are the questions:
1. If you win the prize, how committed are you, and other stakeholders in your community, to see through the Commons deployment over 9+ months. Besides yourself, how many other stakeholders have committed themselves to this project?
✍️Was thinking to mention everyone here as stakeholders, good with everyone?
2. The Token Engineering Commons (TEC) was the first to use our Commons design patterns (technical build and cultural build). Is there anything, in particular, about the TEC or it’s deployment that stands out for you? Anything that you think was done very well or could have been done better?
Token Engineering Commons: https://token-engineering-commons.gitbook.io/tec-handbook/
✍️Was thinking maybe @enti is the best positioned to help us answer this question?
3. Our cultural build is largely based on Elinor Ostrom’s 8 principle for governing commons. Are you, or your community, already familiar these principles? Would you say that one or more are already part of the community’s existing practices?
Cultural build: https://token-engineering-commons.gitbook.io/tec-handbook/what-is-the-tec/the-cultural-build
✍️@Joseph is gonna hammer this out
4. The first Commons deployment was done on Gnosis Chain (formerly xDai Chain). Would there be any reason for your Commons not to deploy on this chain?
✍️ At a loss here, anyone would have any particular opinion on this?
5. Does your community have stakeholders that are not already familiar with web3? If so, have you thought about the plan to onboard them?
✍️ @Mattia will handle this
Let's jam on this, write the best possible answers and I'll record it tonight/tmw morning
With #4 my only thing would be that the off/on ramping isn’t as great/easy (afaik no exchanges admit Gnosis deposits and withdrawals, though ramp.network let’s anyone buy xDai with FIAT). But thinking about Gnosis as one of the biggest players of the ecosystem since 2017 I’m pretty sure they’re putting the effort into making it more accessible.
4:14 PM
Other than that Gnosis is an excellent chain, and being the only one with fees paid in a stablecoin makes it perfect for non-web3 users to get used to it
@enti do you think the on/off ramp w Gnosis is more difficult than other blockchains? To me they are all equally not that easy for non-web3ers(edited)
Joseph
@enti do you think the on/off ramp w Gnosis is more difficult than other blockchains? To me they are all equally not that easy for non-web3ers (edited)
I honestly think it’s more of a marketing stunt lol ethereum so far has upgraded very easily and without issues, they make huge research and test to make sure it works properly, gnosis just want to make them a week or so first and kind of brag about it :p
Hmm, I have to sit down and think that one better but the design patterns seem to work great, I’ve seen some communities go up and down while the tremendous thought behind the TEC has made it more resilient both monetary and community wise. I don’t like that oftentimes feels a bit too rigid.
Hey guys I'm traveling to Portugal on Thursday, hence I anticipated the weekly meeting to Wednesday. Hope as many of you can make it
Agenda
Intro-What we are trying to achieve
Portugal-Week long web3 sprint in Ericeira + discord events
♀️ CS-current status and next steps
Gitcoin-Should we apply y/n?
️ Run channel as DAO?
With #4 my only thing would be that the off/on ramping isn’t as great/easy (afaik no exchanges admit Gnosis deposits and withdrawals, though ramp.network let’s anyone buy xDai with FIAT). But thinking about Gnosis as one of the biggest players of the ecosystem since 2017 I’m pretty sure they’re putting the effort into making it more accessible.
#1 sounds great
#4 I agree with enti one other pro towards the Gnosi Chain its quick and cheap to vote on, I guess the user-friendly aspect of the chain is its short dispute period and fast block time
Yeah that would be a negative side to it, the bridge to ethereum is managed by chosen parties which doesn't make it completely decentralised.
Also with the talks of stable coins due to the events of UST it shed some light again on the full stability of coins like USDT. At the moment I just feel comfortable with USDT and DAI they have been around for ages. But since Gnosis uses the DAI Its another positive aspect to it
Maker Island ☠ Leão
Yeah that would be a negative side to it, the bridge to ethereum is managed by chosen parties which doesn't make it completely decentralised.
Also with the talks of stable coins due to the events of UST it shed some light again on the full stability of coins like USDT. At the moment I just feel comfortable with USDT and DAI they have been around for ages. But since Gnosis uses the DAI Its another positive aspect to it
I think no based on my limited understanding of it
6:58 PM
Thanks @enti for your contributions on #2!
1
Maker Island ☠ Leão
Yeah that would be a negative side to it, the bridge to ethereum is managed by chosen parties which doesn't make it completely decentralised.
Also with the talks of stable coins due to the events of UST it shed some light again on the full stability of coins like USDT. At the moment I just feel comfortable with USDT and DAI they have been around for ages. But since Gnosis uses the DAI Its another positive aspect to it
i recall someone saying that when developing or taking any action you guys try to make every decision based on what the people using the machines want/request?
enti
i recall someone saying that when developing or taking any action you guys try to make every decision based on what the people using the machines want/request?
so i'd say that it's within your values, it's just that it's hard without the proper tooling and that's precisely why you want to make the jump to web3
enti
so i'd say that it's within your values, it's just that it's hard without the proper tooling and that's precisely why you want to make the jump to web3
huhhh i'm not sure, i don't think so, it really doesn't seem to be that big of a deal for most of the people and perhaps have some risks (like breaking stuff that are built on the precise assumption that eth doesn't have all the functions)
7:08 PM
but that's a bit out of my reach, those nuances are too technical for me :p
Added some inputs too the files ill think about if there is anything else to add. in the mean time i you guys need any help in other topics let me know @Mattia@Joseph
enti
not sure if i should add this to the list of technicals cons of the TEC
@enti do you think conviction voting has actually worked pretty well with TEC? It's really hard for me to tell. Doesn't seem like a lot of proposals have passed
Joseph
@enti do you think conviction voting has actually worked pretty well with TEC? It's really hard for me to tell. Doesn't seem like a lot of proposals have passed
Currently the systems that monitor the transactions of a crypto exchange need to use multiple PCs to keep track of and record transactions and ownership.
Has the process been reduced to a point where it can run on a single PC
I guess @pauldaoust could say something about Holochain in this regard.
Also, in terms of the "heavy validators" you mentioned, e.g. monero uses an asic resistant PoW https://www.getmonero.org/get-started/mining/(edited)
Monero, a digital currency that is secure, private, and untraceable
Mattia
Question: can anyone get hurt/loose money with ABC or the token?
I want to make extra sure no one, and I mean no one, is loosing money because of this. Our community is into machines not finance, giving a them a powerful tool they don't know how to manage or handle and driven by hype and fomo could make lots of people loose money, and this I can't accept. Can we design a token system where no one gets hurt?
The Opening Price is the price at which we sell TEC tokens after the Commons Upgrade is complete. During the Hatch, tokens were minted at a value of 1 wxDAI per TECH; and at the Commons Upgrade, TEC tokens will be given to Hatchers at a 1:1 TEC/TECH ratio. Price Floor The price floor is the guaranteed minimum possible price at which TEC tokens...
This is very interesting. Does the price floor mean that the tokens are automatically liquided (project token swapped back for wxDAI) if the ABC price lowers to the price floor?
hey @Mettodo | Njombe Beyond good to see you here again ️ yes did set it up to test it out, didn't really know what I was doing. Indeed we would need a plan/strategy there. Maybe good to discuss in the next DAO meeting next week.
2
11:38 AM
Also, we did not win the CS prize this time. Thanks everyone that helped and chipped in with their time and knowledge. In the next meeting we ought to talk about next steps and strategies forward.
1
11:40 AM
Had some very complicated couple of weeks, will be back on track next week and hopefully bring more life/action to this channel. Hope to see you soon all in the next DAO meeting next thursday.
but realistically you can't really expect to drive much donations just relying on whether people find you or not on the platform
9:32 PM
with the commons stack prize you guys started to make some relations, and it's an effort that shouldn't stop now, then things like finding community for Giveth/Gitcoin becomes way easier
full overview on how gitcoin grant work https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mio3AQlYRA
Seems perfect for us, if we could mobilize 1000ppl donate 1$ that would translate in big matching funds but in order to achieve this we might need a bit of a comms strategy our end.. maybe we could sign up for this round (keeping our expectations low), learn how it works, and really work towards the next round in sept where we'll mobilize the whole community
Hey Hey welcome to this channel very sorry we couldn't win the prize hopefully we'll still find our way to bring the DAO to life. You deep into web3? Keen to contribute to this group?
1:01 PM
Btw I've seen you're based in the Philippines, if you have the time you should meet up with @Butte (PP Philippines) , doing great recycling things in the region ️️️
Mattia
Hey Hey welcome to this channel very sorry we couldn't win the prize hopefully we'll still find our way to bring the DAO to life. You deep into web3? Keen to contribute to this group?
Im best with backend & data processing type tasks.
Not so good with frontend and wouldnt yet consider myself competent with smart contracts, etc.
Im down to contribute just to get to know people and build relationships.
Best not to pass me anything that might require ongoing support tho, I always have lots of balls in the air.
1
Mattia
Btw I've seen you're based in the Philippines, if you have the time you should meet up with @Butte (PP Philippines) , doing great recycling things in the region ️️️
Sounds good. Im always keen to help build momentum where I can
graial
Im best with backend & data processing type tasks.
Not so good with frontend and wouldnt yet consider myself competent with smart contracts, etc.
Im down to contribute just to get to know people and build relationships.
Best not to pass me anything that might require ongoing support tho, I always have lots of balls in the air.
Hey Joseph, as someone who’s familiar with gitcoin I would agree with you! There is absolutely no harm in creating a grant for this round, there are only lessons to be learned. @Mattia there are many anon donors that come from the gitcoin network but even more so it is a way to learn and I think there’s never really a time to be ready
koko
Hey Joseph, as someone who’s familiar with gitcoin I would agree with you! There is absolutely no harm in creating a grant for this round, there are only lessons to be learned. @Mattia there are many anon donors that come from the gitcoin network but even more so it is a way to learn and I think there’s never really a time to be ready
I guess @pauldaoust could say something about Holochain in this regard.
Also, in terms of the "heavy validators" you mentioned, e.g. monero uses an asic resistant PoW https://www.getmonero.org/get-started/mining/(edited)
Thanks for the invitation! It sounds like the question is about whether Holochain would need a super high-powered machine to be a validator? If so, the answer is complicated The simple answer is no -- each person using the app carries their own weight and takes responsibility for validating a small slice of all the public data. But the complicated answer is that it relies on shared visibility into a thousand individual timelines -- basically, with enough eyes on each other, cheaters are likely to get caught. That's a lighter lift, computationally, than shared agreement on one single shared timeline.
The intention was always to make Holochain runnable on end-user hardware. Hope this answers your question; let me know if not!(edited)
1
1:11 AM
just catching up with the conversations -- it seems that Grassroots Economics won the commons prize? Happy for them (I've had the odd conversation with Will Ruddick, the founder, and they're doing inspiring stuff) but sorry to hear for the PP community. I don't love winner-takes all. (edited)
i would've asked this on the call but since i won't be there... do we consider realistic to design a model with the ABC? Just saying this because to my knowledge there's no no-code platform that can put up an ABC or I'm not sure if we'll find a solidity dev that's willing to do that for free or if there's going to be any available funding for that
9:13 PM
may be worth thinking about workarounds with no-code platforms and I'm sure the ABC can be integrated later
enti
i would've asked this on the call but since i won't be there... do we consider realistic to design a model with the ABC? Just saying this because to my knowledge there's no no-code platform that can put up an ABC or I'm not sure if we'll find a solidity dev that's willing to do that for free or if there's going to be any available funding for that
it's a good question and I'm not too sure. Defiantly understand there is no no-code platform for that. However for example https://rally.io/ has a traditional bonding curve that's available to use
Yeah, pretty much any DAO platform has some forms of bonding policies available, for example Garden's default is dynamic with a adjustable target of 30% reserve on the common pool
In terms of the "augmented" part of the ABC, I don't believe it would be that technically difficult to augment the code of a traditional bonding curve contract. However I'm totally not at all knowledgable enough to say either way
Yeah, pretty much any DAO platform has some forms of bonding policies available, for example Garden's default is dynamic with a adjustable target of 30% reserve on the common pool
So the default bonding curve with gardens also separates funds between a reserve and funding pool?
Joseph
In terms of the "augmented" part of the ABC, I don't believe it would be that technically difficult to augment the code of a traditional bonding curve contract. However I'm totally not at all knowledgable enough to say either way
so def. an issue, though we may find someone kind enough to help and if there's a good plan he can be compensated with an attractive allocation of tokens, but solidity devs are scarce so that's something to have in mind
enti
so def. an issue, though we may find someone kind enough to help and if there's a good plan he can be compensated with an attractive allocation of tokens, but solidity devs are scarce so that's something to have in mind
true lol and yeah cool, I'm thinking it'd be nice to get to the point where we're could start the deployment of those things while CS is doing so too for Grassroots Economics
9:30 PM
just to be able to pop in questions and even ask for help so we don't have to have like a full size team working on that
9:30 PM
in case of course we get to have some folks onboard
enti
Yeah, pretty much any DAO platform has some forms of bonding policies available, for example Garden's default is dynamic with a adjustable target of 30% reserve on the common pool
Are you sure most DAO no code platforms have bonding curve options? It feels niche to me
enti
true lol and yeah cool, I'm thinking it'd be nice to get to the point where we're could start the deployment of those things while CS is doing so too for Grassroots Economics
Hello team
Yesterday we had a productive meeting with very valuable contributions from @enti@Jon Simmons@Joseph and more.
Amongst other things, we had one major outcome from the call:
We will run #archived-dao-dev work group as a DAO with its own governance and multi-sig
The mission of this work group is:
Design, test, iterate and develop the Precious Plastic DAO until ready for launchIMPORTANT: if there is any objections to this please surface them NOW so we can handle them together before diving into this
I will now leave a couple of days for this to sink in and create the space for a conversation and possible objections to arise. On Monday I will post possible ways forward with things to work on and the creation of smaller subteams.
So excited to finally get this started ️(edited)
Precious Plastic is the operating system for planetary micro recycling.
Precious Plastic OS includes recycling machines, techniques, digital platforms and a community to help anyone in the world to independently start their plastic recycling projects. In 2022 Precious Plastic helps 700+ orgs or 10.000+ people to tackle the plastic waste problem...
ETH broke the highs of the previous bull cycle.The"gov token"experiment failed!
Time to start recreate onchain Commons?
Crypto imagination was hijacked by the corporations that we are trying to replace.
Let's now experiment w/ NEW foundations based on grassroots rights and value.
Hey everyone, welcome to the first week as a dao for this group ❤️❤️
I propose we start to do the actual work it takes to setup the DAO. I speculate it taking 2-3 weeks to be fully operational.
A few items I could think we ought to work on (with respective teams to be emerging):
1. Name. Agree on a name for this DAO.
2. Mission. Refine the mission of this DAO.
3. Team. Define who is part of genesis team. Additionally would be good to explore how people can join the team in the future.
4. Governance. Work on governance documentation and structure including tools and mechanisms to work together moving forward. @Jon Simmons@enti@Mattia came forward being interested working on this.
5. Multisig. Research what it takes to setup a miltisig for the DAO and what it implies (including setup fees, gas fees etc..) . @unicornio and @enti seem most knowledgeable here
I tagged some of your there, feel free to remove yourself if you can't work on those or come forward if you want to work on anything specifically
If we can sort out these elements throughout June we could be getting on working on the actual PP DAO by july
Much love ✌️(edited)
5
Mattia
Hey everyone, welcome to the first week as a dao for this group ❤️❤️
I propose we start to do the actual work it takes to setup the DAO. I speculate it taking 2-3 weeks to be fully operational.
A few items I could think we ought to work on (with respective teams to be emerging):
1. Name. Agree on a name for this DAO.
2. Mission. Refine the mission of this DAO.
3. Team. Define who is part of genesis team. Additionally would be good to explore how people can join the team in the future.
4. Governance. Work on governance documentation and structure including tools and mechanisms to work together moving forward. @Jon Simmons@enti@Mattia came forward being interested working on this.
5. Multisig. Research what it takes to setup a miltisig for the DAO and what it implies (including setup fees, gas fees etc..) . @unicornio and @enti seem most knowledgeable here
I tagged some of your there, feel free to remove yourself if you can't work on those or come forward if you want to work on anything specifically
If we can sort out these elements throughout June we could be getting on working on the actual PP DAO by july
Much love ✌️ (edited)
Where will we work on these things? Where will the docs live? clickup, google docs, clarity ($), notion ($), discourse (already using for PP community), Figma (we can use my paid acct)/Miro?
Once we decide that, we can dump everything we already have into it and let people start jamming on the details.
1. I'd stick with Precious Plastic to be honest, no need to add "DAO" to everything though Precious Plastic DAO doesn't sound bad either, no strong opinions here
2. Agreed, RnDAO has a miro board with some exercises to "map, asses and plan DAOs" https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVO_yPRJc=/
3. To be discussed on the next meetings
4. Haven't looked at it properly but I believe the miro board above has some insight into how do we agree to make decisions - but we can discuss different ways as well
5. I believe Gnosis Safe is the most appropriate, popular, good UX, bunch of apps and I love how they're working to make it composable (with Zodiac you can start using your Safe as a DAO and plug-in other tools like DAOHaus, etc.) cost is minimal if deployed on a cheap chain like Gnosis - though I wonder if we really need to spin up one as to my understanding there are no funds to manage yet
Jon Simmons
Where will we work on these things? Where will the docs live? clickup, google docs, clarity ($), notion ($), discourse (already using for PP community), Figma (we can use my paid acct)/Miro?
Once we decide that, we can dump everything we already have into it and let people start jamming on the details.
Clarity is the most advanced DAO contribution platform. Share task boards & docs, manage access with tokens, receive bounty payouts, and build your contributor reputation.
Jon Simmons
Where will we work on these things? Where will the docs live? clickup, google docs, clarity ($), notion ($), discourse (already using for PP community), Figma (we can use my paid acct)/Miro?
Once we decide that, we can dump everything we already have into it and let people start jamming on the details.
GM
@SolvProtocol
@DefiNft
Are you up for a Twitter space about "What is the shape of the Commons Launch"?
I absolutely think you guys have the best tools to make it happen.
11:19 AM
@Joseph@Mattia would love to have PP contributing to the agenda of this Twitter Space... adding points that you feel are relevent for the speakers to address
@enti and I had time to jam on what a minimum DAO looks like for PP, and how to progress from there. Here is a figma with open edit permissions. Jump in anytime and share with everyone for Thursdays meet. https://www.figma.com/file/TqpH2sSBFiO7ENVqWQhQB6/PP-DAO
1
Jon Simmons
@enti and I had time to jam on what a minimum DAO looks like for PP, and how to progress from there. Here is a figma with open edit permissions. Jump in anytime and share with everyone for Thursdays meet. https://www.figma.com/file/TqpH2sSBFiO7ENVqWQhQB6/PP-DAO
Alrighty so just to make sure and use this as an example of soft consensus, do we agree on using the upcoming meetings to brainstorm around this figma?
https://www.figma.com/file/TqpH2sSBFiO7ENVqWQhQB6/PP-DAO
Please react to this proposal:
I commit: I will actively work on the outcomes of this decision
I consent: I have no objections to this being implemented but I don’t commit to doing it myself
️ I have a suggestion: I would like to share my idea to improve the proposal and I will describe the suggestion in the thread
✋ I object: I sense that this proposal is not safe to try and I will describe my objection in the thread
I am not comfortable voting: I read the proposal but don't feel comfortable voting on it(edited)
Precious Plastic is the operating system for planetary micro recycling.
Precious Plastic OS includes recycling machines, techniques, digital platforms and a community to help anyone in the world to independently start their plastic recycling projects. In 2022 Precious Plastic helps 700+ orgs or 10.000+ people to tackle the plastic waste problem...
WEB2->ERC20. Unalignment of sweat/money
Web3->Commons/Mutual Credit. Symbiosis of sweat/money
Onchain Mutual Credit=SBT+ERC20 tokenomics.
SBTs are debt.
ERC20s are credit.
When every credit is matched by an EQUAL and OPPOSITE debt, "money" is created and cannot be hoarded.
Do you need a blockchain? And if so, what kind? Trail of Bits has released an operational risk assessment report on blockchain technology. As more businesses consider the innovative advantages of b…
hey everyone
We had to go through some pretty heavy restructuring over the past couple of weeks and a general refocus on the most fundamental elements of Precious Plastic. Unfortunately the DAO development fell out of that and aqre not able to invest our own time into it for the time being
This is not to say conversation can't continue or that any of you could take the lead on this but I won't be able to push it forward for the upcoming months. Quite sad about it as I truly believe PP should be a DAO but I see this more as a pause rather than an end.
The channel will stay open and anyone can continue the conversation and research. As soon as I am able to revive this you guys will be the first ones to know!
Much love to anyone that dedicate precious time to it so far ️
It's a very challenging environment right now. Perfect time to let all the learnings about web3 settle down.
After, a clear picture will emerge of what value the PP members can supply and what value needs to be provided by a DAO back to them.(edited)
3
11:19 AM
Hint: no token, no DAO.
Mattia
hey everyone
We had to go through some pretty heavy restructuring over the past couple of weeks and a general refocus on the most fundamental elements of Precious Plastic. Unfortunately the DAO development fell out of that and aqre not able to invest our own time into it for the time being
This is not to say conversation can't continue or that any of you could take the lead on this but I won't be able to push it forward for the upcoming months. Quite sad about it as I truly believe PP should be a DAO but I see this more as a pause rather than an end.
The channel will stay open and anyone can continue the conversation and research. As soon as I am able to revive this you guys will be the first ones to know!
Much love to anyone that dedicate precious time to it so far ️
I'm very happy to hear back from you! Things are moving really quick and we all have got to adopt to be able to survive, as @unicornio is an opportunity to let the learnings settle down and come back later again with more and better ideas. Looking forward to keep in touch and wishing the best for all of you guys.
PLASTIKS is a web 3.0 marketplace that enables sponsorship of plastic recovery and provides accountability and transparency. We connect companies and individuals to impactful projects around the world that are making a difference in the environment.
We (Njombe Beyond) are being onboarded but have not tested it yet.
They told me that they want to understand the PP ecosystem better and connect with more PP workshops/initiatives.
From what I have heard so far I think PP workshops fit very well, because the recovery certificates (NFTs) sell the stories behind the recovery. Vs empower.eco which, from our experience, is more about numbers (kg of plastic waste)
Joseph
This is very interesting. Does the price floor mean that the tokens are automatically liquided (project token swapped back for wxDAI) if the ABC price lowers to the price floor?
As far as I understood it is a vesting period for hatchers. We cannot sell TEC bought during the hatch = the price in the ABC cannot go below that floor price
Hey there @Joseph@Mattia and anyone else who was involved in the DAO development. My name is Danny, and I work at Seed Club, a DAO accelerator program and network. I think what you guys are building is truly amazing and definitely fit for a DAO structure. I know it’s a complex process, but I’d be happy to chat with you to see if A) there are roadblocks I could help remove, or B) get you to apply for our next cohort in December. I sent you both friend requests.
So back in April I was really interested in helping bring this to fuition. I was told to basically hold off as there was some research being done. I was curious as to where you are all in the process.
We’re excited to announce a $350,000 grant fund for organizations and creators to launch social tokens that advance social and environmental action. This kicks off our ‘Summer Of Action’.
So I had the idea of tokenizing the plastic recycling process since before I discovered this server. Joseph discovered me. Haha I do have a seperate server dedicated to the development of this process if anyone is intereated. The PPT does exist on gnosis chain. To make it tradable we need liquidity. However, for a DAO to work we need community involvement from all sectors of the Precious Plastics ;). I hope its ok the post the link to the server here. Hope to see people join.https://discord.gg/fmAjtePxvk(edited)
New funding mechanism for open source projects.
1st example is for @github contributors
But by adding @CBG_RFNFT NFT chips/tags this can be easily extend to irl open source projects
@preciousplstc @byebyeplastic
BIG ANNOUNCEMENT
We are excited to announce the launch of Gitcoin Grants Stack: a protocol-enabled suite of tools that makes it easy for communities to collectively allocate capital to fund their shared needs
Read all about it
We've redesigned Discord with more forum channels so you can easily find the discussion you're looking for
We've stopped all activity here. Don’t worry though - they'll be available until 31st of December 2023, so you can save any conversation you need. ️ On January 1st, 2024, the old channels will be deleted.
Feel free to explore the new channels and start the conversation there!